From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] KVM: MMU: fask check write-protect for direct mmu
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:45:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5008D477.2020007@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120720003917.GA8951@amt.cnet>
BTW, they are some bug fix patches on -master branch, but
it is not existed on -next branch:
commit: f411930442e01f9cf1bf4df41ff7e89476575c4d
commit: 85b7059169e128c57a3a8a3e588fb89cb2031da1
It causes code conflict if we do the development on -next.
On 07/20/2012 08:39 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:can
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 09:53:29PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> If it have no indirect shadow pages we need not protect any gfn,
>> this is always true for direct mmu without nested
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Xiao,
>
> What is the motivation? Numbers please.
>
> In fact, what case was the original indirect_shadow_pages conditional in
> kvm_mmu_pte_write optimizing again?
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-20 3:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-17 13:50 [PATCH 1/9] KVM: x86: remvoe unnecessary mark_page_dirty Xiao Guangrong
2012-07-17 13:51 ` [PATCH 2/9] KVM: x86: simplify read_emulated Xiao Guangrong
2012-07-19 23:58 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-07-20 2:17 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-07-20 10:58 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-07-20 13:15 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-07-20 19:52 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-07-23 4:23 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-07-17 13:52 ` [PATCH 3/9] KVM: x86: introduce set_mmio_exit_info Xiao Guangrong
2012-07-20 0:03 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-07-20 2:24 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-07-17 13:52 ` [PATCH 4/9] KVM: MMU: track the refcount when unmap the page Xiao Guangrong
2012-07-20 0:09 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-07-17 13:53 ` [PATCH 5/9] KVM: MMU: fask check write-protect for direct mmu Xiao Guangrong
2012-07-20 0:39 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-07-20 2:34 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-07-20 11:09 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-07-20 13:33 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-07-20 3:45 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2012-07-20 11:45 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-07-17 13:54 ` [PATCH 6/9] KVM: using get_fault_pfn to get the fault pfn Xiao Guangrong
2012-07-17 13:54 ` [PATCH 7/9] KVM: mark do not extern bad_pfn Xiao Guangrong
2012-07-17 13:55 ` [PATCH 8/9] KVM: remove is_error_hpa Xiao Guangrong
2012-07-17 13:56 ` [PATCH 9/9] KVM: remove the unused parameter of gfn_to_pfn_memslot Xiao Guangrong
2012-07-20 0:40 ` [PATCH 1/9] KVM: x86: remvoe unnecessary mark_page_dirty Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5008D477.2020007@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.