From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-vc0-f176.google.com (mail-vc0-f176.google.com [209.85.220.176]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E008BE00342 for ; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 06:58:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by vcbfl11 with SMTP id fl11so4607221vcb.35 for ; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 06:58:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OzCyxveETebiMg4NtDPaPqYnKSXzIgP4bmBU3ECMtLg=; b=iHXAM3m8MkRd6WVRilfiZ91WxaNgA8LwkT2D8/peC8x2IyHsfJMkHXU9vOD6U8UG1r DUCVNklhvMdwU+CVmvKX6w1wBdlhD3IumCkrhmLpoyMr3sdnHnP+o/FkGDfsLIiZjDWs bI9LjtWYvdZUeBpuqiVnfpEMkNU/UcPmBPJUvBxwliCmZeAI4B4uF80/mq27tV2P+xae 03DYTkPadnl+7QA0ypZEOgbSXf6cyWk0NlqDHOjoljANuqaUPHwtoZB77jeJEBX7NamV 6tyjOaOJqVAx0RiuDAN2HqEO5fLq5Yw0pxJvip5ZibF8Ouu4rwydYKaXsvffeXZO4bR5 vtow== Received: by 10.52.95.203 with SMTP id dm11mr6458459vdb.70.1342879130996; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 06:58:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.54] (nc-184-4-39-191.dhcp.embarqhsd.net. [184.4.39.191]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n12sm5497535vdu.1.2012.07.21.06.58.49 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 21 Jul 2012 06:58:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <500AB599.4090003@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 09:58:49 -0400 From: Jim Abernathy User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Zanussi References: <5009BB61.5010605@gmail.com> <5009BFAB.9040801@intel.com> <5009C119.3070801@gmail.com> <1342816760.2274.2.camel@trz-ThinkPad-T420> <1342821334.2274.13.camel@trz-ThinkPad-T420> <1342843583.6230.3.camel@trz-ThinkPad-T420> In-Reply-To: <1342843583.6230.3.camel@trz-ThinkPad-T420> Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org, Darren Hart Subject: Re: nothing building under denzil-7.0.1 X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 13:58:52 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 07/21/2012 12:06 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote: > On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 16:55 -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote: >> On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 15:39 -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote: >>> On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 16:35 -0400, Jim Abernathy wrote: >>>> On 07/20/2012 04:29 PM, Scott Garman wrote: >>>>> On 07/20/2012 01:11 PM, Jim Abernathy wrote: >>>>>> There must be some basic thing I'm missing. Nothing that I used to >>>>>> build under denzil 7.0 will now build under denzil 7.0.1 or tracking the >>>>>> denzil branch. Are all the BSPs required to be updated to 7.0.1 before >>>>>> you can run? >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd thought I'd check before I post a bunch of log files. >>>>>> >>>>>> I just downloaded the poky 7.0.1 tarball and cd'ed to that untarred >>>>>> directory and untarred the 7.0 Intel BSPs. >>>>>> >>>>>> There must be a step I'm missing. otherwise this would not have gotten >>>>>> thru testing before deployment. >>>>>> >>>>>> Jim A >>>>> Hi Jim, >>>>> >>>>> We need more specific information about the error(s) you're seeing. >>>>> We've done extensive QA with 7.0.1 and meta-intel, so I imagine there >>>>> must be a step you've forgotten. >>>>> >>>>> For example, you are using the denzil branch of meta-intel, right? >>>>> >>>>> Scott >>>>> >>>> I think it maybe that old problem with the n450 SRCREC being blank in >>>> the linux-yocto bbappend file. Obviously that BSP didn't get fixed >>>> before 7.0.1 was deployed. I'll put in the ones I used to patch in and >>>> see if it works. >>>> >>> I updated the n450 in both the denzil and master meta-intel branches, >>> but the tarball still needs to be updated with that fix. >>> >>> Is this the problem you're seeing, or are there other problems you're >>> seeing with this and/or the other meta-intel BSPs? >>> >> As a sanity check, I just now downloaded the denzil-7.0.1 tarball and >> the denzil sugarbay tarball and built successfully without any problems. >> > Also did a fresh clone of meta-intel, checked out meta-intel/denzil and > successfully built n450 with the denzil-7.0.1 tarball here with no > problems. > > Tom > I can confirm I had no issues doing just what you did. tarball for denzil-7.0.1 and denzil clone for meta-intel and default core-image-sato for n450. Next, I cloned poky and checked out the tag denzil-7.0.1, which in theory should match the tarball I ran with in the above test. I cloned meta-intel and checked out the branch denzil, just as above. So this good news is that worked as expected. The denzil-7.0.1 tag equals the tarball. So the only problem is the denzil branch of poky has some problem that's seen in denzil-7.0.1 as it relates to n450. Jim A >> Tom >> >> >>> Tom >>> >>>> Jim A >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> yocto mailing list >>>> yocto@yoctoproject.org >>>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> yocto mailing list >>> yocto@yoctoproject.org >>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto >