From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qc0-f176.google.com (mail-qc0-f176.google.com [209.85.216.176]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A1D1E0034A for ; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 08:43:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by qcsc21 with SMTP id c21so3025104qcs.35 for ; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 08:43:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=POETY+L9GmXEbdORYJL89/ezq4ONcSXvNtmrzSm12ls=; b=ZgMXs+9ovb20jcIMyzXSlRVGSL6i2suyDSQdmlXIn7tx7vVf40dn5q/WAMvdWpTq3P vq29GoCPqdh9ZBlWfe00AFT2+6Do8LPbnyL9myfryacW3ebKrA1qUKrCrkalLgWmdZrk iMg5uZI3gqVbVqkrZ2yX/8JNOss7xBTWLpvMfy4za8aWiFswlxQnt6eQEtU+23M/blAT qmHl6WbWJdgIBnqJLOkApiS3ZTLkeqR1adg5ioYMgRLUSyRT+HUO9rge/N195+XjbPn4 46LzieWFyuH+/zDxLukVFUDsHeD9pgq1/NQi+vq8ZKGetnedWvb8o+EMsHC2rucrU9xE /nog== Received: by 10.224.194.137 with SMTP id dy9mr15644171qab.67.1342885389476; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 08:43:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.54] (nc-184-4-39-191.dhcp.embarqhsd.net. [184.4.39.191]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id eb10sm6995593qab.4.2012.07.21.08.43.08 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 21 Jul 2012 08:43:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <500ACE0C.1030905@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 11:43:08 -0400 From: Jim Abernathy User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Zanussi References: <5009BB61.5010605@gmail.com> <5009BFAB.9040801@intel.com> <5009C119.3070801@gmail.com> <1342816760.2274.2.camel@trz-ThinkPad-T420> <1342821334.2274.13.camel@trz-ThinkPad-T420> <1342843583.6230.3.camel@trz-ThinkPad-T420> <500AB599.4090003@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <500AB599.4090003@gmail.com> Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org, Darren Hart Subject: Re: nothing building under denzil-7.0.1 X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 15:43:10 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 07/21/2012 09:58 AM, Jim Abernathy wrote: > On 07/21/2012 12:06 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote: >> On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 16:55 -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote: >>> On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 15:39 -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote: >>>> On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 16:35 -0400, Jim Abernathy wrote: >>>>> On 07/20/2012 04:29 PM, Scott Garman wrote: >>>>>> On 07/20/2012 01:11 PM, Jim Abernathy wrote: >>>>>>> There must be some basic thing I'm missing. Nothing that I used to >>>>>>> build under denzil 7.0 will now build under denzil 7.0.1 or >>>>>>> tracking the >>>>>>> denzil branch. Are all the BSPs required to be updated to 7.0.1 >>>>>>> before >>>>>>> you can run? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'd thought I'd check before I post a bunch of log files. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I just downloaded the poky 7.0.1 tarball and cd'ed to that untarred >>>>>>> directory and untarred the 7.0 Intel BSPs. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There must be a step I'm missing. otherwise this would not have >>>>>>> gotten >>>>>>> thru testing before deployment. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jim A >>>>>> Hi Jim, >>>>>> >>>>>> We need more specific information about the error(s) you're seeing. >>>>>> We've done extensive QA with 7.0.1 and meta-intel, so I imagine >>>>>> there >>>>>> must be a step you've forgotten. >>>>>> >>>>>> For example, you are using the denzil branch of meta-intel, right? >>>>>> >>>>>> Scott >>>>>> >>>>> I think it maybe that old problem with the n450 SRCREC being blank in >>>>> the linux-yocto bbappend file. Obviously that BSP didn't get fixed >>>>> before 7.0.1 was deployed. I'll put in the ones I used to patch >>>>> in and >>>>> see if it works. >>>>> >>>> I updated the n450 in both the denzil and master meta-intel branches, >>>> but the tarball still needs to be updated with that fix. >>>> >>>> Is this the problem you're seeing, or are there other problems you're >>>> seeing with this and/or the other meta-intel BSPs? >>>> >>> As a sanity check, I just now downloaded the denzil-7.0.1 tarball and >>> the denzil sugarbay tarball and built successfully without any >>> problems. >>> >> Also did a fresh clone of meta-intel, checked out meta-intel/denzil and >> successfully built n450 with the denzil-7.0.1 tarball here with no >> problems. >> >> Tom >> > I can confirm I had no issues doing just what you did. tarball for > denzil-7.0.1 and denzil clone for meta-intel and default > core-image-sato for n450. > > Next, I cloned poky and checked out the tag denzil-7.0.1, which in > theory should match the tarball I ran with in the above test. I cloned > meta-intel and checked out the branch denzil, just as above. > > So this good news is that worked as expected. The denzil-7.0.1 tag > equals the tarball. > > So the only problem is the denzil branch of poky has some problem > that's seen in denzil-7.0.1 as it relates to n450. > > Jim A > > FYI, I added the meta-baryon layer after I got the n450 straightened out. It's fine as well. Jim A >>> Tom >>> >>> >>>> Tom >>>> >>>>> Jim A >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> yocto mailing list >>>>> yocto@yoctoproject.org >>>>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> yocto mailing list >>>> yocto@yoctoproject.org >>>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto >> >