From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Or Gerlitz Subject: Re: [PATCH] mlx4: Add support for EEH error recovery Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 13:29:43 +0300 Message-ID: <500BD617.20800@mellanox.com> References: <1342814143-5744-1-git-send-email-klebers@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "David S. Miller" , , Jack Morgenstein , Yevgeny Petrilin , , , Shlomo Pongratz To: Kleber Sacilotto de Souza Return-path: Received: from eu2sys200bog102.obsmtp.com ([207.126.150.230]:55664 "HELO eu2sys200bog102.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750986Ab2GVK3w (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Jul 2012 06:29:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1342814143-5744-1-git-send-email-klebers@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 7/20/2012 10:55 PM, Kleber Sacilotto de Souza wrote: > Currently the mlx4 drivers don't have the necessary callbacks to > implement EEH errors detection and recovery [...] Hi, Shlomo Pongratz from Mellanox took a look on the patch, and we'd like to clarify with you something - OTOH you mention EEH (Extended Error Handling) error recovery which is a PPC related term mentioned in Documentation/powerpc/eeh-pci-error-recovery.txt, but OTHO you've implemented callbacks mentioned in the AER (Advanced Error Reporting) doc of Documentation/PCI/pcieaer-howto.txt, is there anything in the code you added which maybe implicitly assumes PPC arch? Or.