From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com>
To: Jaromir Capik <jcapik@redhat.com>,
Linux RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFE] Please, add optional RAID1 feature (= chunk checksums) to make it more robust
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 23:30:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <500CD349.5090500@hardwarefreak.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1897705147.341625.1342995720661.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
Same issue likely.
On 7/22/2012 5:22 PM, Jaromir Capik wrote:
>>> Likewise, if the checksumming you request is implemented in
>>> md/RAID1,
>
> Btw. I like what Roberto proposed ... this could be a completely
> independent layer having it's own device file. MD RAID1 would
> be then built on top of such safe device files. The only thing
> to be implemented directly in the RAID1 would be that immediate
> resyncing in case of discovered read error received from such
> safety layer. And this immediate resyncing could/should be
> optional ...
>
> Jaromir.
>
next parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-23 4:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1897705147.341625.1342995720661.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
2012-07-23 4:30 ` Stan Hoeppner [this message]
[not found] <1082734092.338339.1342995087426.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
2012-07-23 4:29 ` [RFE] Please, add optional RAID1 feature (= chunk checksums) to make it more robust Stan Hoeppner
2012-07-23 9:34 ` Jaromir Capik
2012-07-23 10:53 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-07-23 17:03 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2012-07-23 18:24 ` Roberto Spadim
2012-07-23 21:31 ` Drew
2012-07-23 21:42 ` Roberto Spadim
2012-07-24 4:42 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-07-24 12:51 ` Roberto Spadim
2012-07-27 6:06 ` Adam Goryachev
2012-07-27 13:42 ` Roberto Spadim
2012-07-24 15:09 ` Jaromir Capik
[not found] <17025a94-1999-4619-b23d-7460946c2f85@zmail15.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2012-07-18 11:01 ` Jaromir Capik
2012-07-18 11:13 ` Mathias Burén
2012-07-18 12:42 ` Jaromir Capik
2012-07-18 11:15 ` NeilBrown
2012-07-18 13:04 ` Jaromir Capik
2012-07-19 3:48 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-07-20 12:53 ` Jaromir Capik
2012-07-20 18:24 ` Roberto Spadim
2012-07-20 18:30 ` Roberto Spadim
2012-07-20 20:07 ` Jaromir Capik
2012-07-20 20:21 ` Roberto Spadim
2012-07-20 20:44 ` Jaromir Capik
2012-07-20 20:59 ` Roberto Spadim
2012-07-21 3:58 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-07-18 11:49 ` keld
2012-07-18 13:08 ` Jaromir Capik
2012-07-18 16:08 ` Roberto Spadim
2012-07-20 10:35 ` Jaromir Capik
2012-07-18 21:02 ` keld
2012-07-18 16:28 ` Asdo
2012-07-20 11:07 ` Jaromir Capik
2012-07-20 11:14 ` Oliver Schinagl
2012-07-20 11:28 ` Jaromir Capik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=500CD349.5090500@hardwarefreak.com \
--to=stan@hardwarefreak.com \
--cc=jcapik@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.