From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boaz Harrosh Subject: Re: [git pull] vfs.git; pile 1 Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 11:20:25 +0300 Message-ID: <500D0949.9040301@panasas.com> References: <20120722100920.GZ31729@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20120722202030.GB31729@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Linus Torvalds , , , Stephen Rothwell , Trond Myklebust To: Al Viro Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120722202030.GB31729@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On 07/22/2012 11:20 PM, Al Viro wrote: > I think the least painful solution is this: I've created a new branch > (for-linus-2) in there, growing off the parent of merge in nfs.git. > I've put the fixup to kern_path_locked() there as a separate commit > + stuff that went in for-linus after that point. > Does this means that between "kern_path_locked() patch" and it's fixup the tree is not bisectable? or is it just an enhancement/simplification? Not having any opinion, just wants to know Thanks Boaz