From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gao feng Subject: Re: flush cache according to 'preferred life time' Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:44:39 +0800 Message-ID: <500D1D07.3090103@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <4A71D24947E78D43BC584A7CD4391A41017DE48F@SIXPRD0410MB359.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com>,<500D05D6.7090108@cn.fujitsu.com> <4A71D24947E78D43BC584A7CD4391A41017DE4C1@SIXPRD0410MB359.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com>,<500D0A24.6060200@cn.fujitsu.com> <4A71D24947E78D43BC584A7CD4391A41017DE4FB@SIXPRD0410MB359.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" To: BALAKUMARAN KANNAN Return-path: Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:46033 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750969Ab2GWJoZ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jul 2012 05:44:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4A71D24947E78D43BC584A7CD4391A41017DE4FB@SIXPRD0410MB359.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: =E4=BA=8E 2012=E5=B9=B407=E6=9C=8823=E6=97=A5 16:36, BALAKUMARAN KANNAN= =E5=86=99=E9=81=93: > Than you Gao-san. Your patch is helpful. I will try that. Also I am f= acing another problem. Tahi test case section nd test case 145 is faili= ng if gc_interval is 30. The test case is as follows > * The tester node (tn) sends RA with curhoplimit 64 > * tn sends a ICMP_REQUEST and checks the ICMP_REPLY from nut is havi= ng hoplimit 64. (it is fine in my case) > * Then the tn sends a RA with curhoplimit 0. (It should be ignored) > * Then again tn sends ICMP_REQUEST and checks the ICMP_REPLY from nu= t whether the hoplimit remains 64 (but it changes to 255 if cache is pr= esent. But once I changed the gc_interval to 1, this testcase passes) > Can you please explain what is the reason.=20 >=20 Hi Can you test with the last kernel? Maybe this bug has been fixed too. Thanks