All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: fix chip->base handling in of_gpio_simple_xlate()
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:43:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <500D632B.3000206@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1342977052-7880-1-git-send-email-zonque@gmail.com>

(Cc: Arnd)

On 22.07.2012 19:10, Daniel Mack wrote:
> of_gpio_simple_xlate() is called for each chip when a GPIO is looked up.
> When registering several chips off the same DT node (with different pin
> offsets) however, the lookup fails as the GPIO number passed in to
> of_gpio_simple_xlate() is likely higher than the chip's ->ngpio value.
> 
> Fix that by taking into account the chip's ->base value, and return the
> relative offset of the pin inside the chip.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com>
> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
> ---
> 
> I'm currently porting the PXA pieces over to DT, and stumbled over what
> looks like an obvious bug to me. Correct me if I'm mistaken, but I see
> no reason why one shouldn't be able to instanciate several GPIO chips
> from a single DT node.
> 
> Thanks,
> Daniel
> 
>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c |    4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
> index d18068a..51bc232 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
> @@ -147,13 +147,13 @@ int of_gpio_simple_xlate(struct gpio_chip *gc,
>  	if (WARN_ON(gpiospec->args_count < gc->of_gpio_n_cells))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	if (gpiospec->args[0] >= gc->ngpio)
> +	if (gpiospec->args[0] >= gc->ngpio + gc->base)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	if (flags)
>  		*flags = gpiospec->args[1];
>  
> -	return gpiospec->args[0];
> +	return gpiospec->args[0] - gc->base;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_gpio_simple_xlate);
>  
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-23 14:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-22 17:10 [PATCH] gpiolib: fix chip->base handling in of_gpio_simple_xlate() Daniel Mack
2012-07-23 14:43 ` Daniel Mack [this message]
2012-07-24 12:56   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-24 13:04     ` Daniel Mack
2012-07-24 14:08       ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-24 15:22         ` Daniel Mack

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=500D632B.3000206@gmail.com \
    --to=zonque@gmail.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=linus.walleij@stericsson.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.