All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "André Gall" <dm-crypt@andregall.de>
To: dm-crypt@saout.de
Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] aes-xts-plain with aes_x86_64 makes my SSD 5x slower than my encrypted HD
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 19:27:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <500D8993.7030802@andregall.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <500D3776.2000307@redhat.com>

I remember a test which I conducted after I received my Intel SDD 510 
120 GB about 1 year ago. I don't remember all the details, but the 
essence was that write speed decreased dramatically if the write process 
wasn't aligned.

I did:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda bs=4k
I got around 400 Mb/sec, which was expected. But when I did:

dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda bs=5k
I got only around 40 Mb/sec

When you write in 5k blocks, the SSD has to do a lot of overhead because 
of the Read-Modify-Write operations. I guess this might also be the case 
if you write in 4k blocks, but don't align them to the SSD's "native" 
blocks. So I would check for any misalignment.

Regards,
André

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-07-23 17:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-22 19:07 [dm-crypt] aes-xts-plain with aes_x86_64 makes my SSD 5x slower than my encrypted HD Marc MERLIN
2012-07-22 19:47 ` Yves-Alexis Perez
2012-07-22 20:39   ` Marc MERLIN
2012-07-22 21:47     ` Arno Wagner
2012-07-23  6:07       ` Yves-Alexis Perez
2012-07-23  6:28       ` Marc MERLIN
2012-07-23  8:14         ` Arno Wagner
2012-07-23 10:46           ` Milan Broz
2012-07-23 11:09             ` Yves-Alexis Perez
2012-07-23 11:37               ` Milan Broz
2012-07-23 15:08                 ` André Gall
2012-07-23 17:27                 ` André Gall [this message]
2012-07-24 14:06             ` Heinz Diehl
2012-07-24 14:16               ` Milan Broz
2012-07-23 16:12           ` Marc MERLIN
2012-07-23 16:19             ` Yves-Alexis Perez
2012-07-23 17:54               ` Marc MERLIN
2012-07-23 19:26                 ` Yves-Alexis Perez
2012-07-23 17:15             ` Milan Broz
2012-07-23 17:51               ` Marc MERLIN
2012-07-23 21:31                 ` Milan Broz
2012-07-24  5:57                   ` Marc MERLIN
2012-07-24  6:25                     ` Heinz Diehl
2012-07-24 15:02                       ` Marc MERLIN
2012-07-24 15:19                         ` Milan Broz
2012-07-24 16:09                           ` Marc MERLIN
2012-07-24 13:54                     ` Milan Broz
     [not found]                       ` <500E9099.8050501@redhat.com>
2012-07-24 14:27                       ` Heinz Diehl
2012-07-24 14:58                         ` Heinz Diehl
2012-07-24 15:38                           ` Marc MERLIN
2012-07-24 16:48                             ` Heinz Diehl
2012-07-24  6:11                   ` Heinz Diehl
2012-07-22 21:55     ` Marc MERLIN
2012-07-22 20:22 ` Heinz Diehl
2012-08-12 12:49 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2012-08-16  7:43   ` Marc MERLIN
     [not found]     ` <502D1F96.3080905@andregall.de>
2012-08-16 17:57       ` Marc MERLIN

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=500D8993.7030802@andregall.de \
    --to=dm-crypt@andregall.de \
    --cc=dm-crypt@saout.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.