From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Glauber Costa Subject: Re: containers and cgroups mini-summit @ Linux Plumbers Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 15:52:59 +0400 Message-ID: <500FDE1B.4090907@parallels.com> References: <4FFDF321.4030103@openvz.org> <500FD022.6000608@parallels.com> <20120725115148.GA6213@sergelap> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120725115148.GA6213@sergelap> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Serge Hallyn Cc: Kir Kolyshkin , Frederic Weisbecker , Daniel Lezcano , Johannes Weiner , Tejun Heo , Rohit Seth , Greg Thelen , Eric Biederman , Balbir Singh , Dhaval Giani , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Paul Turner , Tim Hockin , Suleiman Souhlal , Dave Kleikamp , cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, devel-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, James Bottomley , Pavel Emelyanov , Maxim Patlasov On 07/25/2012 03:51 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Glauber Costa (glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org): >> On 07/12/2012 01:41 AM, Kir Kolyshkin wrote: >>> Gentlemen, >>> >>> We are organizing containers mini-summit during next Linux Plumbers (San >>> Diego, August 29-31). >>> The idea is to gather and discuss everything relevant to namespaces, >>> cgroups, resource management, >>> checkpoint-restore and so on. >>> >>> We are trying to come up with a list of topics to discuss, so please >>> reply with topic suggestions, and >>> let me know if you are going to come. >>> >>> I probably forgot a few more people (such as, I am not sure who else >>> from Google is working >>> on cgroups stuff), so fill free to forward this to anyone you believe >>> should go, >>> or just let me know whom I missed. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Kir. >> >> I just came up with the following preliminary list of sessions: >> >> http://wiki.linuxplumbersconf.org/2012:containers > > Thanks. We could also add devices namespace to the list. I'm fine NOT > having it in the list, as I think we're agreed that it should come after > user namespaces are complete. > How about a "future of namespaces" generic placeholder?