From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yann Cantin Subject: [ebeam] Specific usb driver vs hid generic-usb for an input device Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 02:53:00 +0200 Message-ID: <501094EC.70906@laposte.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp01.smtpout.orange.fr ([80.12.242.123]:22087 "EHLO smtp.smtpout.orange.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752646Ab2GZAxF (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jul 2012 20:53:05 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.100] (coyote.ysoft.org [192.168.1.100]) by nestor.ysoft.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F54E2055D for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 02:52:59 +0200 (CEST) Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: linux-input@vger.kernel.org Hi, I've coded a usb driver for a device (eBeam) that is currently blindly handled by the hid generic-usb. The driver itself is pure usb+input, mostly based on usbtouchscreen.c My question : Is it sufficient to add an entry in hid_ignore_list[] (hid/hid-core.c) to get hid out of the way and let my driver be picked to handle the device ? -- Yann Cantin A4FEB47F --