From: Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] tests/9pfs: Factor out do_fs_version() helper
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 17:50:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5011369.IO3LVfFpa3@silver> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201020174156.229f8008@bahia.lan>
On Dienstag, 20. Oktober 2020 17:41:56 CEST Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 17:34:05 +0200
>
> Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com> wrote:
> > On Dienstag, 20. Oktober 2020 17:11:05 CEST Greg Kurz wrote:
> > > fs_version() is a top level test function. Factor out the sugar
> > > to a separate helper instead of hijacking it in other tests.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c b/tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c
> > > index c15908f27b3d..63f91aaf77e6 100644
> > > --- a/tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c
> > > +++ b/tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c
> > > @@ -567,10 +567,8 @@ static void v9fs_rflush(P9Req *req)
> > >
> > > v9fs_req_free(req);
> > >
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static void fs_version(void *obj, void *data, QGuestAllocator *t_alloc)
> > > +static void do_fs_version(QVirtio9P *v9p)
> > >
> > > {
> > >
> > > - QVirtio9P *v9p = obj;
> > > - alloc = t_alloc;
> > >
> > > const char *version = "9P2000.L";
> > > uint16_t server_len;
> > > char *server_version;
> > >
> > > @@ -585,13 +583,19 @@ static void fs_version(void *obj, void *data,
> > > QGuestAllocator *t_alloc) g_free(server_version);
> > >
> > > }
> >
> > So the naming convention from now on shall be do_fs_*() for non-toplevel
> > functions there. Not that I care too much about the precise prefix, but
> > how
> > about just do_*() for them instead?
>
> I've prepended "do_" to the existing names by pure laziness but I'm
> fine with any prefix or naming convention actually.
>
> So just tell me what you prefer and I'll send a v2.
It's really just more pleasant for the eye to have the prefix a bit shorter.
So use do_*() or any other kind of xx_*() or xxx_*() prefix that comes to your
mind. It will be fine with me.
Thanks Greg!
Best regards,
Christian Schoenebeck
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-20 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-20 15:10 [PATCH 0/5] tests/9pfs: Code refactoring Greg Kurz
2020-10-20 15:11 ` [PATCH 1/5] tests/9pfs: Factor out do_fs_version() helper Greg Kurz
2020-10-20 15:34 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2020-10-20 15:41 ` Greg Kurz
2020-10-20 15:50 ` Christian Schoenebeck [this message]
2020-10-20 15:11 ` [PATCH 2/5] tests/9pfs: Turn fs_readdir_split() into a helper Greg Kurz
2020-10-20 15:11 ` [PATCH 3/5] tests/9pfs: Set alloc in fs_create_dir() Greg Kurz
2020-10-20 15:11 ` [PATCH 4/5] tests/9pfs: Factor out do_fs_attach() helper Greg Kurz
2020-10-20 15:11 ` [PATCH 5/5] tests/9pfs: Turn fs_mkdir() into a helper Greg Kurz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5011369.IO3LVfFpa3@silver \
--to=qemu_oss@crudebyte.com \
--cc=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.