From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jon Hunter Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 01/10] ARM: PMU: Add runtime PM Support Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 10:16:15 -0500 Message-ID: <50115F3F.7050705@ti.com> References: <4FD64083.3020800@ti.com> <20120612092842.GA2991@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <4FD7B1DC.30108@ti.com> <20120612213150.GC24380@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <4FD7C597.7060501@ti.com> <20120702095539.GD22239@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <4FF1D15E.7040301@ti.com> <20120702220117.GD25234@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <4FF6340A.6020409@ti.com> <50109233.3090302@ti.com> <20120726150534.GD6382@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from devils.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.153]:51688 "EHLO devils.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752133Ab2GZPQl (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jul 2012 11:16:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120726150534.GD6382@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Will Deacon Cc: Kevin Hilman , Paul Walmsley , Benoit Cousson , Ming Lei , linux-omap , linux-arm On 07/26/2012 10:05 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 01:41:23AM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote: >> Hi Will, > > Hi Jon, > >> On 07/05/2012 07:40 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: >> I just wanted to let you know that I have been updating the PMU patches >> for OMAP. Latest can be found here [1]. I have not included Paul's patch >> [2] in this series at the moment, because although it works well for >> OMAP4, I need to create the HWMOD structures for OMAP3. Without these >> structures it breaks OMAP3 PMU support. Once this is done we should be >> able to get rid for the OMAP3 dependency on ETM. Unfortunately, Benoit >> (Mr HWMOD) is out on his holidays but should be back next week and then >> maybe he can give me some guidance on this HWMOD stuff. > > Ok, thanks for updating me. I've pushed the patches out onto my > perf/omap4-dev branch as that seems to be a good place to collate the > current state of things. I've not tried doing anything with it yet though. Ok, great. Let me know if you have any problems. I have ran some initial testing on omap3430, omap4430 and omap4460 and it seems ok (AFAICT). > Do you know when Benoit will be back online? I *believe* Monday. However, I am sure he will have a lot of catching up to do. Anything particular or you just want to get this stuff finalised/done? Cheers Jon From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jon-hunter@ti.com (Jon Hunter) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 10:16:15 -0500 Subject: [PATCH V2 01/10] ARM: PMU: Add runtime PM Support In-Reply-To: <20120726150534.GD6382@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> References: <4FD64083.3020800@ti.com> <20120612092842.GA2991@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <4FD7B1DC.30108@ti.com> <20120612213150.GC24380@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <4FD7C597.7060501@ti.com> <20120702095539.GD22239@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <4FF1D15E.7040301@ti.com> <20120702220117.GD25234@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <4FF6340A.6020409@ti.com> <50109233.3090302@ti.com> <20120726150534.GD6382@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> Message-ID: <50115F3F.7050705@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 07/26/2012 10:05 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 01:41:23AM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote: >> Hi Will, > > Hi Jon, > >> On 07/05/2012 07:40 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: >> I just wanted to let you know that I have been updating the PMU patches >> for OMAP. Latest can be found here [1]. I have not included Paul's patch >> [2] in this series at the moment, because although it works well for >> OMAP4, I need to create the HWMOD structures for OMAP3. Without these >> structures it breaks OMAP3 PMU support. Once this is done we should be >> able to get rid for the OMAP3 dependency on ETM. Unfortunately, Benoit >> (Mr HWMOD) is out on his holidays but should be back next week and then >> maybe he can give me some guidance on this HWMOD stuff. > > Ok, thanks for updating me. I've pushed the patches out onto my > perf/omap4-dev branch as that seems to be a good place to collate the > current state of things. I've not tried doing anything with it yet though. Ok, great. Let me know if you have any problems. I have ran some initial testing on omap3430, omap4430 and omap4460 and it seems ok (AFAICT). > Do you know when Benoit will be back online? I *believe* Monday. However, I am sure he will have a lot of catching up to do. Anything particular or you just want to get this stuff finalised/done? Cheers Jon