From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sanddollar.geekisp.com ([216.168.135.167]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SukJA-0005aW-DC for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 15:10:20 +0200 Received: (qmail 20015 invoked by uid 1003); 27 Jul 2012 12:58:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.105?) (philip@opensdr.com@96.240.160.48) by mail.geekisp.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 27 Jul 2012 12:58:47 -0000 Message-ID: <50129086.50807@balister.org> Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 08:58:46 -0400 From: Philip Balister User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120717 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1642696.DpFH6cyWG1@helios> In-Reply-To: <1642696.DpFH6cyWG1@helios> Subject: Re: OpenEmbedded website X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 13:10:20 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 07/27/2012 08:43 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Friday 27 July 2012 13:47:32 Andrea Adami wrote: >> after one year, I'd consider the transition to the oe-core development >> model concluded. >> Though, most people visiting the OpenEmbedded site do come on IRC or on the >> ML asking about oe-classic. >> >> Unfortunately, the infos and the whole wiki are misgiving: there should be >> immediate links to the oe-core model, to the layers, to the Yocto >> documentation. >> >> In my opinion, we should archive the old site and restart from scratch. >> >> How would you improve the current (embarrassing) situation? > > Actually the more I think about it the more I agree we should just start from > scratch - move the current one to oldwiki.openembedded.org and start a brand > new one; move over content where appropriate and create new stuff for > everything else. Not only will it clear stale things out, but it should create > some impetus to fill the void with new up-to-date content. I have no objection to starting from scratch. But, to do this, we need people to commit to working on the wiki for a few weeks to get things back up to speed. Philip