From: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] xfs: merge xfs_ialloc_ag_select into xfs_dialloc
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:21:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5016C27C.9060700@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <501182AE.2090109@sgi.com>
On 07/26/12 12:47, Mark Tinguely wrote:
>
>
> + if (pass < 2) {
> + /*
> + * Is there enough free space for the file plus a block
> + * of inodes?
> + */
> + xfs_extlen_t longest = pag->pagf_longest;
> + int needspace =
> + S_ISDIR(mode) || S_ISREG(mode) || S_ISLNK(mode);
> +
> + if (!longest)
> + longest = pag->pagf_flcount > 0;
> +
> + if (pag->pagf_freeblks <
> + XFS_IALLOC_BLOCKS(mp) + needspace)
> + goto nextag;
> ^^^^^^^ here
>
> + if (longest < XFS_IALLOC_BLOCKS(mp))
> + goto nextag;
>
> ^^^^^^^ and here
> + }
>
> Isn't the agbp locked from the earlier xfs_ialloc_read_agi()?
> Do we want to release them before going on to the next AG?
>
> Thank-you,
>
> --Mark.
>
same line of thought as above:
+ if (!pag->pagf_init) {
+ int flags = pass ? 0 : XFS_ALLOC_FLAG_TRYLOCK;
+
+ error = xfs_alloc_pagf_init(mp, tp, agno, flags);
+ if (error)
+ goto out_error;
+ }
Also, don't we still have the AGI buffer locked when we try to
initialize the AGF? If the AGF initialization fails, do we need to also
unlock the AGI buffer before returning?
Thank-you.
--Mark.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-30 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-04 14:54 [PATCH 0/7] inode allocator refactoring V2 Christoph Hellwig
2012-07-04 14:54 ` [PATCH 1/7] xfs: remove xfs_ialloc_find_free Christoph Hellwig
2012-07-04 14:54 ` [PATCH 2/7] xfs: split xfs_dialloc Christoph Hellwig
2012-07-29 20:55 ` Ben Myers
2012-07-04 14:54 ` [PATCH 3/7] xfs: remove the alloc_done argument to xfs_dialloc Christoph Hellwig
2012-07-26 17:48 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-07-04 14:54 ` [PATCH 4/7] xfs: add a short cut to xfs_dialloc for the non-NULL agbp case Christoph Hellwig
2012-07-26 17:50 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-07-04 14:54 ` [PATCH 5/7] xfs: refactor xfs_ialloc_ag_select Christoph Hellwig
2012-07-26 17:53 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-07-04 14:54 ` [PATCH 6/7] xfs: do not read the AGI buffer in xfs_dialloc until nessecary Christoph Hellwig
2012-07-26 17:53 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-07-04 14:54 ` [PATCH 7/7] xfs: merge xfs_ialloc_ag_select into xfs_dialloc Christoph Hellwig
2012-07-26 17:47 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-07-30 17:21 ` Mark Tinguely [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-06-05 14:46 [PATCH 0/7] inode allocator refactoring Christoph Hellwig
2012-06-05 14:46 ` [PATCH 7/7] xfs: merge xfs_ialloc_ag_select into xfs_dialloc Christoph Hellwig
2012-06-18 3:10 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5016C27C.9060700@sgi.com \
--to=tinguely@sgi.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.