Re: [GIT PULL] New TPM driver, hwrng driver and fixes

["H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>]

On 07/30/2012 01:51 PM, Kent Yoder wrote:
> 
>>> Perhaps we should just do the same "err = total ? total : -EIO;" here
>>> and the above statement can just turn into a break;.
>>
>>   Yeah, this seems like the right thing to do.
>>
>>>> -     ret = my_get_random(hash, SHA1_DIGEST_SIZE);
>>>> +     ret = tpm_get_random(TPM_ANY_NUM, hash, SHA1_DIGEST_SIZE);
>>>>       if (ret < 0)
>>>>               return ret;
>>>
>>> You are still not checking the return values correctly!
>>
>>   Dave, can you weigh in on these individual cases?  In some cases
>> like capping a pcr I think using uninitialized stack data could be
>> better than failing...
> 
> I got in touch with Dave today, who'd like the full checking done now
> that we can. Here's a new patch, let me know what you think...
> 
> Thanks,
> Kent
> 

Looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>

	-hpa