From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (relay1.mentorg.com [192.94.38.131]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B5ACE00288 for ; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:34:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from svr-orw-exc-10.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.58]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1Sw6yX-0003ek-EH from Vladimir_Zapolskiy@mentor.com ; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:34:41 -0700 Received: from SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([137.202.0.104]) by SVR-ORW-EXC-10.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:34:27 -0700 Received: from [172.30.2.207] (137.202.0.76) by SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com (137.202.0.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.289.1; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 08:34:25 +0100 Message-ID: <50178A7B.5030800@mentor.com> Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:34:19 +0300 From: Vladimir Zapolskiy User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.5) Gecko/20120624 Icedove/10.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Denys Dmytriyenko References: <1343126062-26998-1-git-send-email-vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com> <5016E705.7040806@mentor.com> <20120730221049.GB23003@edge> In-Reply-To: <20120730221049.GB23003@edge> X-Originating-IP: [137.202.0.76] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Jul 2012 07:34:27.0739 (UTC) FILETIME=[EA6546B0:01CD6EEE] Cc: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] linux-omap-psp 2.6.32: fix am37x-evm failing build X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 07:34:42 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Denys, On 31.07.2012 01:10, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:56:53PM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote: >> Hi, >> >> any comments about the issue? Should I firstly create a bug in >> http://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org, if I want to fix the problem? > > I would rather try updating it to 2.6.37 - hopefully that one doesn't have > this issue with recent binutils... Do you have any specific requirements to > stay with 2.6.32 instead? If not, 2.6.37 is what is being released as part of > SDK for AM37x EVM - I'll look into porting it into meta-ti... thank you in advance. There is no objection from my side about such upgrade. And you're right, linux-omapl138-psp-2.6.37 doesn't contain similar problematic patches, which should be fixed or removed. With best wishes, Vladimir