From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Howells Subject: Re: 64-bit inode number issues Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 08:58:27 +0100 Message-ID: <5018.1160380707@redhat.com> References: <20061007210131.GA17717@infradead.org> <20060928164529.GA3497@infradead.org> <13246.1159971501@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> Cc: aviro@redhat.com, akpm@osdl.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:48553 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932340AbWJIH6o (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Oct 2006 03:58:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20061007210131.GA17717@infradead.org> To: Christoph Hellwig Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Al commented he doesn't like that. He also think we should give the > 64bit inode numbers a try, so I'd say: > > o add an inode32 option for nfs that mirrors the XFS option > o turn it off by default in -mm and see what goes boom I believe -mm is currently carrying the 64-bit inodes for NFS patch. David