From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from avon.wwwdotorg.org ([70.85.31.133]:46160 "EHLO avon.wwwdotorg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755205Ab2GaQST (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jul 2012 12:18:19 -0400 Message-ID: <50180547.9040603@wwwdotorg.org> Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:18:15 -0600 From: Stephen Warren MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thierry Reding CC: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Grant Likely , Rob Herring , devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, Russell King , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Colin Cross , Olof Johansson , Mitch Bradley , Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] ARM: tegra: Add PCIe device tree support References: <1343332512-28762-1-git-send-email-thierry.reding@avionic-design.de> In-Reply-To: <1343332512-28762-1-git-send-email-thierry.reding@avionic-design.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 07/26/2012 01:55 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > This patch series adds support for device tree based probing of the PCIe > controller found on Tegra SoCs. Thierry, I think one thing that would help here would be to split up this series into one per subsystem, and to get all the dependencies merged by the respective maintainers. Preferably, each subsystem would export a stable branch (perhaps consisting of just these patches) that I can then merge into the Tegra tree and use as a basis for the PCIe driver itself. Hopefully this approach will get more traction on all the non-Tegra changes. Does that sound like a good plan? Or, I can just take it all through the Tegra tree, but I'll definitely need acks on all/most of the non-Tegra patches, since although the patches themselves are quite small, I'd like to be sure that maintainers are OK with the conceptual changes, like initializing PCI controllers later than at present etc. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] ARM: tegra: Add PCIe device tree support Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:18:15 -0600 Message-ID: <50180547.9040603@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1343332512-28762-1-git-send-email-thierry.reding@avionic-design.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1343332512-28762-1-git-send-email-thierry.reding-RM9K5IK7kjKj5M59NBduVrNAH6kLmebB@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Thierry Reding Cc: linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Bjorn Helgaas , linux-pci-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Grant Likely , Rob Herring , devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, Russell King , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Colin Cross , Olof Johansson , Mitch Bradley , Arnd Bergmann List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On 07/26/2012 01:55 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > This patch series adds support for device tree based probing of the PCIe > controller found on Tegra SoCs. Thierry, I think one thing that would help here would be to split up this series into one per subsystem, and to get all the dependencies merged by the respective maintainers. Preferably, each subsystem would export a stable branch (perhaps consisting of just these patches) that I can then merge into the Tegra tree and use as a basis for the PCIe driver itself. Hopefully this approach will get more traction on all the non-Tegra changes. Does that sound like a good plan? Or, I can just take it all through the Tegra tree, but I'll definitely need acks on all/most of the non-Tegra patches, since although the patches themselves are quite small, I'd like to be sure that maintainers are OK with the conceptual changes, like initializing PCI controllers later than at present etc. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:18:15 -0600 Subject: [PATCH v3 00/10] ARM: tegra: Add PCIe device tree support In-Reply-To: <1343332512-28762-1-git-send-email-thierry.reding@avionic-design.de> References: <1343332512-28762-1-git-send-email-thierry.reding@avionic-design.de> Message-ID: <50180547.9040603@wwwdotorg.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 07/26/2012 01:55 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > This patch series adds support for device tree based probing of the PCIe > controller found on Tegra SoCs. Thierry, I think one thing that would help here would be to split up this series into one per subsystem, and to get all the dependencies merged by the respective maintainers. Preferably, each subsystem would export a stable branch (perhaps consisting of just these patches) that I can then merge into the Tegra tree and use as a basis for the PCIe driver itself. Hopefully this approach will get more traction on all the non-Tegra changes. Does that sound like a good plan? Or, I can just take it all through the Tegra tree, but I'll definitely need acks on all/most of the non-Tegra patches, since although the patches themselves are quite small, I'd like to be sure that maintainers are OK with the conceptual changes, like initializing PCI controllers later than at present etc.