From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <5018FC7B.8080103@xenomai.org> Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 11:52:59 +0200 From: Philippe Gerum MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <208C6975C932E94F86239FEA59CCA632068318D3@AUSMXMBX02.mrws.biz> <50128EE5.3090904@xenomai.org> <208C6975C932E94F86239FEA59CCA63206831B5C@AUSMXMBX02.mrws.biz> <5018F130.40301@xenomai.org> <5018F534.6000503@xenomai.org> <5018FC50.80207@xenomai.org> In-Reply-To: <5018FC50.80207@xenomai.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai] [PATCH, Xenomai 2.5.6] List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gilles Chanteperdrix Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org On 08/01/2012 11:52 AM, Philippe Gerum wrote: > On 08/01/2012 11:21 AM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >> On 08/01/2012 11:04 AM, Philippe Gerum wrote: >>> On 08/01/2012 08:58 AM, dietmar.schindler@manroland-web.com wrote: >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Philippe Gerum [mailto:rpm@xenomai.org] >>>>> Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 2:52 PM >>>>> To: Schindler, Dietmar RAEK1 MRA >>>>> Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org >>>>> Subject: Re: [Xenomai] [PATCH, Xenomai 2.5.6] >>>>> >>>>> On 07/27/2012 02:45 PM, dietmar.schindler@manroland-web.com wrote: >>>>>> These are patches for two files in ksrc/nucleus of Xenomai 2.5.6 >>>>>> to cure >>>>> an incompatibility with Linux 2.4; if they are bad in form, please >>>>> let me >>>>> know. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You should backport this patch from the 2.6 tree instead: >>>>> e3c13f0685c2edf2a2ce30cd239b3f >>>> >>>> I'm sorry, I can't figure out how to locate this patch. >>> >>> From this tree: >>> git://git.xenomai.org/xenomai-2.6.git >>> >>> However, I found the attached message where you pointed to another >>> patch, just for Xenomai 2.5.6, so I'll use that one, and let's forget my >>> surplus duplication of work. >> >> I wonder if the 2.5 git does not already contain the fix: >> >> http://git.xenomai.org/?p=xenomai-2.5.git;a=commit;h=c208eda73e263207fe32a01e35931e82e4a18321 >> >> > > Yes, but non released, since this is on top of 2.5.6. It is part of the > set of pending commits I mentioned lately, that should lead to 2.5.7, > because s,because,before, we close that branch for good. > -- Philippe.