From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: Miroslav Rezanina <mrezanin@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH][RFC] Add compare subcommand for qemu-img
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 15:23:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50192DBA.1050104@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50192D3F.7010303@redhat.com>
Il 01/08/2012 15:21, Eric Blake ha scritto:
>> > +++ b/qemu-img.c
>> > @@ -96,7 +96,9 @@ static void help(void)
>> > " '-a' applies a snapshot (revert disk to saved state)\n"
>> > " '-c' creates a snapshot\n"
>> > " '-d' deletes a snapshot\n"
>> > - " '-l' lists all snapshots in the given image\n";
>> > + " '-l' lists all snapshots in the given image\n"
>> > + "Parameters to compare subcommand:\n"
>> > + " '-g' Second image format (in case it differs from first image)\n";
> As written, this sounds like:
>
> No -f, no -g => probe both
> -f, no -g => -f applies to both
> no -f, -g => probe first, use -g for second
> -f, -g => use given formats for both
>
> Is that really what you meant, or do we actually get:
>
> -f, no -g => -f applies to first, probe second
>
> I think both interpretations could make sense, but I'd prefer having the
> omission of -g imply probing the second file type regardless of the
> presence or absence of -f, for consistency.
+1
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-01 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1736118218.6697488.1343814369561.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
2012-08-01 10:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH][RFC] Add compare subcommand for qemu-img Miroslav Rezanina
2012-08-01 10:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-08-01 10:44 ` Miroslav Rezanina
2012-08-01 10:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-08-02 10:06 ` Miroslav Rezanina
2012-08-02 11:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-08-01 12:22 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-08-01 13:21 ` Eric Blake
2012-08-01 13:23 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2012-08-02 5:19 ` Miroslav Rezanina
2012-08-03 6:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2][RFC] " Miroslav Rezanina
2012-08-03 15:23 ` Eric Blake
2012-11-20 12:36 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-11-20 13:04 ` Miroslav Rezanina
2012-11-21 9:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] " Miroslav Rezanina
2012-11-22 9:18 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-11-27 8:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4] " Miroslav Rezanina
2012-11-30 14:22 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-12-04 11:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5] " Miroslav Rezanina
2012-12-04 15:22 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-12-06 12:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6] " Miroslav Rezanina
2012-12-11 9:16 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-12-11 12:27 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-12-11 13:09 ` Miroslav Rezanina
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50192DBA.1050104@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=mrezanin@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.