All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ananth@in.ibm.com,
	a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, mingo@redhat.com,
	srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: Q: user_enable_single_step() && update_debugctlmsr()
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 15:32:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50192FF5.1060208@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120801130118.GA2386@redhat.com>

On 08/01/2012 03:01 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Lets ignore uprobes which needs the changes anyway. This is
> only used by ptrace and the task is stopped. So, unless I missed
> something obvious, this update_debugctlmsr() is simply unneeded,
> __switch_to/__switch_to_xtra should notice _TIF_BLOCKSTEP and do
> update_debugctlmsr(DEBUGCTLMSR_BTF).

It looks like it unless a processes ptraces itself (which does not make
much sense anyway).

> But, worse, isn't it wrong? Suppose that debugger switches to
> another TIF_SINGLESTEP&&  !TIF_BLOCKSTEP task, in this case
> we "leak" DEBUGCTLMSR_BTF, no?

__switch_to_xtra() should notice the difference in the TIF_BLOCKSTEP
flag and disable it.

> IOW, it seems to me we could safely remove update_debugctlmsr()
> arch/x86/kernel/step.c. However, if we want to re-use this code
> in uprobes, then we probably need to add "if (child == current)".
It looks that way.

>
> Or I am totally confused. Help!
>
> Oleg.

Sebastian

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-01 13:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-26 15:20 [PATCH] uprobes: don't enable/disable signle step if the user did it Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-07-26 17:31 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-27 17:39   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-07-27 18:04     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-26 17:38 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-07-30 11:06 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2012-07-30 14:16   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-30 15:15     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-07-31  4:01     ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2012-07-31  5:22     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-07-31 17:38       ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-31 11:52     ` [PATCH 1/2] uprobes: Use a helper instead of ptrace's single step enable Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-07-31 11:52       ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/uprobes: implement x86 specific arch_uprobe_*_step Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-07-31 17:51         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-31 19:30           ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-01 12:26             ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-01 13:01               ` Q: user_enable_single_step() && update_debugctlmsr() Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-01 13:32                 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2012-08-01 13:46                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-01 13:54                     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-01 14:01                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-01 14:21                         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-01 14:31                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-01 14:47                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-01 14:51                             ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-01 15:01                               ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-01 15:12                                 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-01 15:14                                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-01 18:46                                     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-02 13:05                                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-02 13:20                                         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-02 13:24                                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-01 13:43         ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/uprobes: implement x86 specific arch_uprobe_*_step Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-02  4:58           ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2012-07-31 17:40       ` [PATCH 1/2] uprobes: Use a helper instead of ptrace's single step enable Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50192FF5.1060208@linutronix.de \
    --to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=roland@hack.frob.com \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.