From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1SwfXW-0006eF-TC for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:29:06 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45245) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SwfXU-0006dj-Lg for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:29:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SwfXT-00022F-KI for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:29:04 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:35644) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SwfXT-00022B-Cl for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:29:03 -0400 Received: by weys10 with SMTP id s10so6124824wey.0 for ; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 13:29:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; bh=P1rcj0yNFRfoITOjB5nYb/Rx18Nc4HKn2ZhdzO9cd2U=; b=fKOjYKY1g7wgcxHpSovq9GUZ+1y3hbC1PgIkYxcjCy6WnY4iJMj+9wM1Np84JfPZOR L7dkmyDLxHRGikSbeffGkoB+5yReipo8R21VHy0xK/r1sAJzvirc7w53cHHhXGrCF9VT 9ptdprNCdxc+VdMFn0uMJlmfAcmXesQdE8/tYxuk0bp1oEYoPoB8mZbVrTS5gg4171xU gecPTYAs0KIEFxUMFZs1/kML59cwMHBAYjIsJkWO5GT0wmns7p0v/bQ/b0SAXoxEhXgK hoNQAHz7Q+tChhLP5Tdb8TyXGELyPPkHNDFBOLn3kj1R17wuaW33VFHAPhWyiq317enr LxIA== Received: by 10.180.81.165 with SMTP id b5mr14674688wiy.17.1343852941814; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 13:29:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian.x201.phnet (173-156.79-83.cust.bluewin.ch. [83.79.156.173]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ck9sm11333551wib.2.2012.08.01.13.29.00 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 01 Aug 2012 13:29:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <50199180.80804@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 22:28:48 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?VmxhZGltaXIgJ8+GLWNvZGVyL3BoY29kZXInIFNlcmJpbmVua28=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.5) Gecko/20120624 Icedove/10.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: grub-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: A patch to enhance biosdisk initrd loading speed for grub2 References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig8E1095EC63E4330FE3CA3880" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 74.125.82.169 X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 20:29:05 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig8E1095EC63E4330FE3CA3880 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 01.08.2012 16:04, Wang Weber wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I am very interested in GRUB2. Recently I found that the linux initrd > loading speed (i386-pc) is quite poor compared with GRUB1. I compared > grub-1.98 with grub0.97, it is almost 7 times worse.=20 >=20 Please use latest version (2.00 or bzr) before doing such comparisons. This is something that was fixed quite some time ago. --=20 Regards Vladimir '=CF=86-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko --------------enig8E1095EC63E4330FE3CA3880 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREKAAYFAlAZkYkACgkQNak7dOguQgnS1wEAtBP1M0L72gGUVaQbDXgp9Hcu dYdV3jGevTVwpRDTMskA/2qqofhGAZwx6p001Zhj3DxHsc2eo7jFSpFPfmk0gi3Z =LOt/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig8E1095EC63E4330FE3CA3880--