From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Allow busses with #size-cells=0 Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:03:25 -0600 Message-ID: <5019A7AD.7010006@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1343259277-19037-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> <50199445.6090101@wwwdotorg.org> <501999E1.5090404@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <501999E1.5090404-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: "devicetree-discuss" To: Rob Herring Cc: Stephen Warren , devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, Mark Brown , Rob Herring List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 08/01/2012 03:04 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > On 08/01/2012 03:40 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 07/25/2012 05:34 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: >>> From: Stephen Warren >>> >>> It's quite legitimate for a DT node to specify #size-cells=0. One example >>> is a node that's used to collect a number of non-memory-mapped devices. >>> In that scenario, there may be multiple child nodes with the same name >>> (type) thus necessitating the use of unit addresses in node names, and >>> reg properties: >> >> Does anyone have any comment on this patch? > > No. Looks fine. I'll apply for 3.7 or do you have something that depends > on it? Great! Given the discussions on this topic before, it sure seemed like no news was bad news here, but I guess not:-) I'm going to add some new device tree content in 3.7 that will rely on this patch to work. However, since it's a new feature/DT-content, I don't think we need to manage the dependency any more than having this and the other patches both show up in 3.7 at some time. Thanks.