From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from licorne.daevel.fr ([178.32.94.222]:56640 "EHLO licorne.daevel.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751013Ab2HBQSN (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Aug 2012 12:18:13 -0400 Received: from 89-156-116-126.rev.numericable.fr ([89.156.116.126] helo=[192.168.0.10]) by licorne.daevel.fr with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Swy6F-0000I7-FA for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 18:18:11 +0200 Message-ID: <501AA842.5080300@daevel.fr> Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 18:18:10 +0200 From: Olivier Bonvalet MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5038 (linux 3.4.7) References: <501987FF.9080304@daevel.fr> <20120802132259.GO17430@twin.jikos.cz> <501A836F.90506@daevel.fr> <20120802135354.GQ17430@twin.jikos.cz> In-Reply-To: <20120802135354.GQ17430@twin.jikos.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 02/08/2012 15:53, David Sterba wrote: > On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 03:41:03PM +0200, Olivier Bonvalet wrote: >> Yes... it's a copy from my /var/log/kern.log. Is it really "disabled" ? > > I was mistaken, it really is enabled unconditionally in ctree.h:55. > Josef says that the V0 extent refs are not used for a long time, so the > question is how did they appear in your filesystem. Did you switch to a > new kernel from a very old one? > > > david > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > mmm I have upgraded that system every two months, but the first setup is from april 2011 I think. Should I start a "scrub" on all that systems installed a long time ago ?