From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Niko!" Subject: Ceph fs stability Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 19:10:49 +0200 Message-ID: <501AB499.1080706@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-bk0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:34903 "EHLO mail-bk0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752872Ab2HBRKw (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Aug 2012 13:10:52 -0400 Received: by bkwj10 with SMTP id j10so4356647bkw.19 for ; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 10:10:50 -0700 (PDT) Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org Hi! we are using ceph 0.48 on three nodes to provide rbd images for further four kvm nodes (not kernel mapped) with no big issues and would mount the ceph fs on the kvm nodes just to store xml virtual machine definitions in order to have them immediately in the case an host crashes (we are in multimds configuration). As ceph fs is not production ready what are the possible problems? May the fs corrupt the rbd pool or damages will be limited only to the data/metadata pools (acceptable for us)? may the fs hang the entire cluster or kvm client nodes? Regards. Niko