From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from brockman.in8.de ([85.214.220.56]:53937 "EHLO mail.in8.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750744Ab2HCE7U (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Aug 2012 00:59:20 -0400 Message-ID: <501B5AA7.20808@jan-o-sch.net> Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 06:59:19 +0200 From: Jan Schmidt MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Liu Bo , Josef Bacik CC: Arne Jansen , linux-btrfs , Stefan Behrens Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Btrfs: remove superblock writing after fatal error References: <1343821552-28726-1-git-send-email-sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> <50191AD3.9080401@gmail.com> <50192A11.3060109@jan-o-sch.net> <50192FCE.30006@gmail.com> <50193DDA.20504@giantdisaster.de> <501A56E3.3080401@giantdisaster.de> <501A583D.8030600@gmail.com> <501A61ED.3000908@gmx.net> <501A65B9.5060004@gmail.com> <501A6731.4000405@gmx.net> <501A6B0D.6050303@gmail.com> <501A84CA.10604@gmx.net> <501A8E7A.6070601@jan-o-sch.net> <501B436F.1040105@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <501B436F.1040105@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: [added Josef] Josef: Please queue this patch for rc2, we finally agreed. On Fri, August 03, 2012 at 05:20 (+0200), Liu Bo wrote: > On 08/02/2012 10:28 PM, Jan Schmidt wrote: >> If such a situation doesn't exist, there's no need for this flag. The fact that >> ext has such a flag doesn't convince me, probably because I know nothing about >> ext. I can imagine that they can detect file system errors without the ability >> to return to a potentially older consistent state. >> > > This error flag is also used to indicate filesystem's error state for > transaction cleanup, so keeping it in memory is reasonable. Granted :-) -Jan