All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
To: Devin Heitmueller <dheitmueller@kernellabs.com>
Cc: Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] get rid of fe_ioctl_override()
Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2012 18:31:06 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <501EE61A.2060804@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGoCfizhL6=WhV9-9RMx9PX8ctV2Ao+GyMzPL8T67g4y5nBWAw@mail.gmail.com>

Em 05-08-2012 15:44, Devin Heitmueller escreveu:
> On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> <mchehab@redhat.com> wrote:
>> There's just one driver using fe_ioctl_override(), and it can be
>> replaced at tuner_attach call. This callback is evil, as only DVBv3
>> calls are handled.
>>
>> Removing it is also a nice cleanup, as about 90 lines of code are
>> removed.
>>
>> Get rid of it!
> 
> Did you consult with anyone about this?  Did you talk to the
> maintainer for the driver that uses this functionality (he's not on
> the CC: for this patch series).  Did you actually do any testing to
> validate that it didn't break anything?
> 
> This might indeed be a piece of functionality that can possibly be
> removed, assuming you can answer yes to all three of the questions
> above.

This is not how it works. Patches are posted at the ML and developers can
review and comment about them. Does those patches break something? If not, 
please stop flaming.

With regards to Cc the driver maintainer (mkrufky), the patch also got
forwarded to him, in priv (it were supposed to be sent via git send-email, 
but, as it wasn't, the patch was manually forwarded for him to review,
just after the patchbomb).

In any case, my intention is to wait for a couple days before merging
the patches I posted today, as the dvb-usb-v2 is too new, and it is good
to hear some comments about it.

Regards,
Mauro

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-05 21:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-05 18:16 [PATCH 0/2] get rid of fe_ioctl_override() Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-08-05 18:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] [media] dvb core: remove support for post FE legacy ioctl intercept Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-08-05 18:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] [media] dvb: get rid of fe_ioctl_override callback Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-08-06 12:30   ` Antti Palosaari
2012-08-05 18:44 ` [PATCH 0/2] get rid of fe_ioctl_override() Devin Heitmueller
2012-08-05 21:31   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2012-08-05 23:51     ` Devin Heitmueller
2012-08-06 12:00 ` Antti Palosaari

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=501EE61A.2060804@redhat.com \
    --to=mchehab@redhat.com \
    --cc=dheitmueller@kernellabs.com \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.