From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] acpi-cpufreq: Move modern AMD cpufreq support to acpi-cpufreq Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2012 16:39:14 -0700 Message-ID: <501F0422.2030308@zytor.com> References: <1343305724-2809-1-git-send-email-andre.przywara@amd.com> <201208052320.14712.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201208052320.14712.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Andre Przywara , cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Garrett , Andreas Herrmann , Thomas Renninger , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov On 08/05/2012 02:20 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, July 26, 2012, Andre Przywara wrote: >> The programming model for cpufreq on current AMD CPUs is almost identical >> to the one used on Intel and VIA hardware. This patchset merges support >> into acpi-cpufreq and removes it from powernow-k8. >> >> This patchset is heavily based on Matthew Garrett's V4 from last July. >> The boosting part has been mostly reworked and documentation for it >> has been added. Also there was a need for (yet another) BIOS quirk >> on AMD desktop boards. >> >> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara > > Peter, any objection to this series? > No. It might be good for Borislav & Co to look it over, though, if they haven't already. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.