From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SyHdj-0006gV-L3 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 09:22:11 +0200 Received: from azsmga002.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.35]) by azsmga101.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Aug 2012 00:10:26 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="130658857" Received: from dell-desktop (HELO [10.237.105.32]) ([10.237.105.32]) by AZSMGA002.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Aug 2012 00:10:25 -0700 Message-ID: <501F6E54.1010309@intel.com> Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 10:12:20 +0300 From: Radu Moisan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <1344236047-28547-1-git-send-email-radu.moisan@intel.com> <20120806065544.GD3267@jama.jama.net> In-Reply-To: <20120806065544.GD3267@jama.jama.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to upstream stable 2012.07 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 07:22:11 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 08/06/2012 09:55 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 09:54:07AM +0300, Radu Moisan wrote: >> For u-boot-fw-utils, fw_enc.c was changed and it requires a header >> file config.h which is autogenerated at config so it requires a >> "make NAME_config". >> I used for testing coreboot-x86. > Is build with gold resolved in this new release already? By forcing bfd > or to provide working binaries when built with gold? > > More info: > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2012-August/026943.html I don't know what linker is used, I guess the default one. If you can point out to me how to check, I'll be glad to do it. The patch in your link was not in my tree at the time I've tested, if that is relevant in any way. thanks, radu