From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Henningsson Subject: Re: Plumbers: Please split audio topics into separate sessions Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 22:14:56 +0200 Message-ID: <502025C0.2050508@canonical.com> References: <50201664.7000804@canonical.com> <20120806193858.GB16199@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from youngberry.canonical.com (youngberry.canonical.com [91.189.89.112]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDF3E265DE5 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 21:45:10 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20120806193858.GB16199@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Takashi Iwai , "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On 08/06/2012 09:38 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 09:09:24PM +0200, David Henningsson wrote: > >> Audio uConf: HD-audio cooking && QA/Testing >> Audio uConf: Expose Routing && DSPs in ASoC >> Audio uConf: Time Alignment && PA on Android > >> Please split these three sessions into six. It is better to have a >> little more time than necessary (even if I believe we easily fill 45 >> minutes per topic), than having to skip a topic just because the other >> topic took more time than expected. > > The two ASoC topics certainly don't need to be split, they're roughly > the same area. I'd be really surprised if the last two were terribly > time consuming individually. What other topic than "DSPs on ASoC" are you referring to? I thought "Expose routing" was not ASoC specific. At least it does not look that way from the presentation text. -- David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd. https://launchpad.net/~diwic