From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: guido@trentalancia.com (Guido Trentalancia)
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 20:10:13 +0200
Subject: [refpolicy] [PATCH v2]: mcelog module initial rewrite
In-Reply-To: <5021550C.7060608@tresys.com>
References: <201208061245.q76CjODc032232@vivaldi30.register.it>
	<1344260405.29329.38.camel@d30.localdomain>
	<1344260555.29329.40.camel@d30.localdomain>
	<1344260767.29329.42.camel@d30.localdomain>
	<5021550C.7060608@tresys.com>
Message-ID: <50215A05.60700@trentalancia.com>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

Hello Christopher.

On 07/08/2012 19:49, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
> On 08/06/12 09:46, Dominick Grift wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 14:45 +0200, Guido Trentalancia wrote:
>>
>> <..snip ..>
>>
>> Also don't create patches on patches ( i think your v2 patch is a patch
>> on your initial patch?)
>
> I'm still sorting through all the emails, but if thats the case, Guido, please resubmit as a proper patch set (no patches on patches).

It's not patches on patches: they are all the same patch in different 
versions.

Increasing version numbers imply increased stability, improved style and 
so on. But it was mostly working since the initial version, which 
creates an advantage in terms of time, I suppose, if you consider the 
actual state is basically unsupported (daemon won't start).

Since Dominick is not entirely happy with it, I suggest you apply the 
latest version (v4) and then let him follow on, as I am entirely 
satisfied with such version and at the same time I believe I have 
followed all of his advice as applicable (except from the booleans that 
I need on my system).

Regards,

Guido