From: "zhenzhong.duan" <zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Feng Jin <joe.jin@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: kernel bootup slow issue on ovm3.1.1
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 17:23:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50223027.6080502@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120807162637.GB15053@phenom.dumpdata.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2612 bytes --]
? 2012-08-08 00:26, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk ??:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 03:22:50PM +0800, zhenzhong.duan wrote:
>> Hi maintainers,
>>
>> We meet a uek2 bootup slow issue on our ovm product(ovm3.0.3 and ovm3.1.1).
>>
>> The system env is an exalogic node with 24 cores + 100G mem (2 socket ,
>> 6 cores per socket, 2 HT threads per core).
>> After boot up this node with all cores enabled,
>> We boot a pvhvm with 12vpcus (or 24) + 90 GB + pci passthroughed device,
>> it takes 30+ mins to boot.
>> If we remove passthrough device from vm.cfg, bootup takes about 2 mins.
>> If we use a small mem(eg. 10G + 24 vcpus), bootup takes about 3 mins.
>> So a big mem + passthrough device made the worst case.
>>
>> If we boot this node with HT disabled from BIOS. Now only 12 cores are
>> available.
>> OVM on same node, same config with 12vpcus+90GB boots in 1.5 mins!
>>
>> After some debug, we found it's in kernel mtrr init that make this delay.
>>
>> mtrr_aps_init()
>> \-> set_mtrr()
>> \-> mtrr_work_handler()
>>
>> kernel spin in mtrr_work_handler.
>>
>> But we don't know the scene hide in the hypervisor. Why big mem +
>> passthrough made the worst case.
>> Is this already fixed in xen upstream?
>> Any comments are welcome, I'll upload all data depend on your need.
> What happens if you run with a upstream version of kernel? Say v3.4.7 ?
Hi konrad, Jan,
I tried 3.5.0-2.fc17.x86_64 and 3.6.0-rc1.
*
3.5.0-2.fc17.x86_64 took ~30 mins.*
Below is piece of fc17 dmesg:
#22[ 0.002999] installing Xen timer for CPU 22
#23[ 0.002999] installing Xen timer for CPU 23
[ 1.844896] Brought up 24 CPUs
[ 1.844898] Total of 24 processors activated (140449.34 BogoMIPS).
*block for 30 mins here.*
[ 1.899794] devtmpfs: initialized
[ 1.905956] atomic64 test passed for x86-64 platform with CX8 and
with SSE
*
3.6.0-rc1 took more than 2 hours.*
piece of dmesg:
cpu 22 spinlock event irq 218
[ 1.884775] #22[ 0.001999] installing Xen timer for CPU 22
cpu 23 spinlock event irq 225
[ 1.932764] #23[ 0.001999] installing Xen timer for CPU 23
[ 1.977734] Brought up 24 CPUs
[ 1.978706] smpboot: Total of 24 processors activated (140449.34
BogoMIPS)
*block for more than 2 hours here.*
[ 1.988859] devtmpfs: initialized
[ 2.021785] dummy:
[ 2.023706] NET: Registered protocol family 16
[ 2.026735] ACPI: bus type pci registered
[ 2.028002] PCI: Using configuration type 1 for base access
I also send a patch to lkml that can workaround this issue, but I don't
know the reason of block in xen side.
link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/7/50
regards
zduan
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3775 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-08 9:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-07 7:22 kernel bootup slow issue on ovm3.1.1 zhenzhong.duan
2012-08-07 8:37 ` Jan Beulich
2012-08-08 9:48 ` zhenzhong.duan
2012-08-08 14:47 ` Jan Beulich
2012-08-08 15:01 ` Jan Beulich
2012-08-09 9:42 ` zhenzhong.duan
2012-08-09 10:35 ` Jan Beulich
2012-08-10 4:40 ` zhenzhong.duan
2012-08-10 14:22 ` Jan Beulich
2012-08-13 7:58 ` zhenzhong.duan
2012-08-13 9:29 ` Jan Beulich
2012-08-13 11:08 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-29 5:19 ` zhenzhong.duan
2012-08-29 18:28 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-29 5:36 ` zhenzhong.duan
2012-08-30 9:03 ` Tim Deegan
2012-09-19 2:39 ` zhenzhong.duan
2012-09-19 10:29 ` Jan Beulich
2013-04-29 17:55 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-04-30 10:37 ` George Dunlap
2012-08-31 9:07 ` Jan Beulich
2012-08-13 9:07 ` Tim Deegan
2012-08-07 16:26 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-08 9:23 ` zhenzhong.duan [this message]
2012-08-08 14:43 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50223027.6080502@oracle.com \
--to=zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com \
--cc=joe.jin@oracle.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.