From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.saout.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.saout.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6Q5jEGUyQgfp for ; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 17:45:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 17:45:13 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <50228984.5090708@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 17:45:08 +0200 From: Milan Broz MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5022864F.8030402@archlinux.org> In-Reply-To: <5022864F.8030402@archlinux.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] dm-crypt multithreaded yet? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Thomas_B=E4chler?= Cc: dm-crypt@saout.de On 08/08/2012 05:31 PM, Thomas B=E4chler wrote: > This is in 2.6.38 and later, I think: No, it is not. This is something different. In current kernel is per-cpu changes but it will not use parallel cpu cores if it is submitted from the same cpu. Mikulas' patches tries to create parallel threads and run operations on all cores (plus some other changes as sorting). Milan