All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: Jia Hongtao-B38951 <B38951@freescale.com>
Cc: Wood Scott-B07421 <B07421@freescale.com>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Li Yang-R58472 <r58472@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/3] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie initialization code
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 10:53:46 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50228B8A.7010008@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <412C8208B4A0464FA894C5F0C278CD5D01A4B1D9@039-SN1MPN1-002.039d.mgd.msft.net>

On 08/07/2012 10:57 PM, Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Wood Scott-B07421
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 11:20 PM
>> To: Jia Hongtao-B38951
>> Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; Kumar Gala; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Li
>> Yang-R58472
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/3] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie
>> initialization code
>>
>> On 08/07/2012 01:23 AM, Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote:
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Wood Scott-B07421
>>>> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2012 11:16 PM
>>>> To: Jia Hongtao-B38951
>>>> Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; Kumar Gala; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Li
>>>> Yang-R58472
>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/3] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie
>>>> initialization code
>>>>
>>>> On 08/05/2012 09:39 PM, Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Wood Scott-B07421
>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2012 12:04 AM
>>>>>> To: Jia Hongtao-B38951
>>>>>> Cc: Kumar Gala; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Wood Scott-B07421; Li
>>>>>> Yang-R58472
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/3] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie
>>>>>> initialization code
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 08/02/2012 10:39 PM, Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>> From: Kumar Gala [mailto:galak@kernel.crashing.org]
>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 8:24 PM
>>>>>>>> To: Jia Hongtao-B38951
>>>>>>>> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Wood Scott-B07421; Li
>>>>>>>> Yang-R58472
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/3] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie
>>>>>>>> initialization code
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You need to convert all boards to use fsl_pci_init before this
>> patch.
>>>>>>>> Otherwise we'll end up with PCI getting initialized twice on
>> boards.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - k
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If we covert all boards with platform driver in this patch PCI will
>>>>>>> be initialized only once without converting all boards to use
>>>>>>> fsl_pci_init first.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then we'd have to pick apart core changes from board changes when
>>>>>> reviewing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If we convert all boards to use fsl_pci_init before this patch and
>>>>>>> convert them to use platform driver again after this patch. Then
>>>>>>> between this patch and next pci will be initialized twice too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why?  That one patch should both create the platform driver and
>>>>>> remove the init from fsl_pci_init() -- except things like primary
>> bus
>>>>>> detection which has to happen globally.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Scott
>>>>>
>>>>> "One patch both create the platform driver and remove the init from
>>>>> fsl_pci_init()" means we should create platform driver and applied to
>>>>> all boards. If so why not just directly convert all boards using
>>>>> platform driver?
>>>>
>>>> Because it's harder to review when you have a bunch of board code in
>> the
>>>> patch in addition to core changes.
>>>>
>>>> Because you might want people to actually test on the boards in
>> question
>>>> when converting, especially given the change in how primary buses are
>>>> determined, and that some boards may need to provide their own
>>>> alternative.
>>>>
>>>> -Scott
>>>
>>> But if we separate the core changes and the boards update, between this
>> two
>>> patches PCI will be initialized twice.
>>
>> As I said earlier, you can remove the initcall and require boards to
>> manually call fsl_pci_init() until all boards are converted.
>>
>> -Scott
> 
> As I said earlier, I can do this but it does not solve the twice-init problem.

I must have missed it.  Why does it not solve the problem?  If a board
doesn't call fsl_pci_init(), the platform driver doesn't get registered.

> If I do this first and then add platform driver we also have to convert all
> boards using platform driver in the same patch.
> 
> We finally using the platform driver so Why do you keep insisting on converting
> all boards using fsl_pci_init() first even it does no improvement.

What we're asking for is bisectability (don't have any intermediate
stages where PCI gets initialized twice), and the ability to have a
smooth transition where boards can be converted as people are able to
test them and look into their individual needs regarding primary bus.

-Scott

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-08 15:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-02 11:42 [PATCH V4 0/3] PCI patch set description Jia Hongtao
2012-08-02 11:42 ` [PATCH V4 1/3] powerpc/fsl-pci: Only scan PCI bus if configured as a host Jia Hongtao
2012-08-02 11:42 ` [PATCH V4 2/3] powerpc/swiotlb: Enable at early stage and disable if not necessary Jia Hongtao
2012-08-02 12:54   ` Kumar Gala
2012-08-03  2:21     ` Jia Hongtao-B38951
2012-08-03 12:38       ` Kumar Gala
2012-08-03 14:42         ` Li Yang
2012-08-03 16:15           ` Kumar Gala
2012-08-02 11:42 ` [PATCH V4 3/3] powerpc/fsl-pci: Unify pci/pcie initialization code Jia Hongtao
2012-08-02 12:23   ` Kumar Gala
2012-08-02 15:59     ` Scott Wood
2012-08-03  3:39     ` Jia Hongtao-B38951
2012-08-03 16:03       ` Scott Wood
2012-08-06  2:39         ` Jia Hongtao-B38951
2012-08-06 15:15           ` Scott Wood
2012-08-07  6:23             ` Jia Hongtao-B38951
2012-08-07 15:19               ` Scott Wood
2012-08-08  3:57                 ` Jia Hongtao-B38951
2012-08-08 15:53                   ` Scott Wood [this message]
2012-08-09  3:52                     ` Jia Hongtao-B38951
2012-08-10 22:59                       ` Scott Wood
2012-08-02 20:18   ` Scott Wood
2012-08-03  2:20     ` Jia Hongtao-B38951
2012-08-03 16:09       ` Scott Wood
2012-08-06  4:11         ` Tabi Timur-B04825
2012-08-06 14:03           ` Scott Wood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50228B8A.7010008@freescale.com \
    --to=scottwood@freescale.com \
    --cc=B07421@freescale.com \
    --cc=B38951@freescale.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=r58472@freescale.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.