From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47596) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SzNNc-00036W-5L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 03:42:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SzNNa-0004XC-KL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 03:42:04 -0400 Received: from mail.profihost.ag ([85.158.179.208]:49642) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SzNNa-0004X6-8j for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 03:42:02 -0400 Message-ID: <502369C7.7000300@profihost.ag> Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 09:41:59 +0200 From: Stefan Priebe MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <502283FA.2080506@profihost.ag> <5022912B.2000607@redhat.com> <50235527.4090804@profihost.ag> <50236059.7060801@redhat.com> <4A799203-5BFF-4DE9-9B85-459096EBEC22@profihost.ag> <50236484.2090702@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <50236484.2090702@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-scsi vs. virtio-blk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: qemu-devel starting line: /usr/bin/qemu-x86_64 -chardev socket,id=qmp,path=/var/run/qemu-server/103.qmp,server,nowait -mon chardev=qmp,mode=control -pidfile /var/run/qemu-server/103.pid -daemonize -usbdevice tablet -name kvmcrash -smp sockets=1,cores=8 -nodefaults -boot menu=on -vga cirrus -k de -device virtio-scsi-pci,id=scsihw0,bus=pci.0,addr=0x5 -drive file=iscsi://10.0.255.100/iqn.1986-03.com.sun:02:8a9019a4-4aa3-cd8a-f723-f05db9085ef9/0,if=none,id=drive-scsi1,cache=writethrough,aio=native -device scsi-hd,bus=scsihw0.0,channel=0,scsi-id=0,lun=1,drive=drive-scsi1,id=scsi1 -drive file=iscsi://10.0.255.100/iqn.1986-03.com.sun:02:8a9019a4-4aa3-cd8a-f723-f05db9085ef9/2,if=none,id=drive-virtio0,cache=writethrough,aio=native -device virtio-blk-pci,drive=drive-virtio0,id=virtio0,bus=pci.0,addr=0xa -drive file=iscsi://10.0.255.100/iqn.1986-03.com.sun:02:8a9019a4-4aa3-cd8a-f723-f05db9085ef9/1,if=none,id=drive-scsi0,cache=writethrough,aio=native -device scsi-hd,bus=scsihw0.0,channel=0,scsi-id=0,lun=0,drive=drive-scsi0,id=scsi0,bootindex=102 -m 4096 -netdev type=tap,id=net0,ifname=tap103i0,script=/var/lib/qemu-server/pve-bridge,vhost=on -device virtio-net-pci,mac=BA:5B:86:AD:14:3A,netdev=net0,bus=pci.0,addr=0x12,id=net0,bootindex=300 I've also needed this patch: https://github.com/stefanha/qemu/commit/d3e3082e6fe63d45cea2d92c41ad148dccf1b63e otherwise kvm crash while hardware detection of ubuntu / debian. Greets, Stefan Am 09.08.2012 09:19, schrieb Paolo Bonzini: > Il 09/08/2012 09:07, Stefan Priebe ha scritto: >> Yes should be possible. guest is Debian or Ubuntu. I couldn't find a >> tag for V1.1.1 which I ran from source. So where to start bisect? > > You can start from the v1.1.0 tag. > > Can you give the command line, perhaps it is enough to reproduce? > > Paolo > >> Stefan >> >> Am 09.08.2012 um 09:01 schrieb Paolo Bonzini : >> >>> Il 09/08/2012 08:13, Stefan Priebe ha scritto: >>>> i really would like to test with actual git. But my VMs run >>>> awfully SLOW with actual git version. Boot process prints one >>>> line every two seconds. So i can't test. Is there a patch or >>>> backport for this problem? >>> >>> Hmm, no, I haven't seen it reported either... How are you running >>> the VMs? What guest is in there? >>> >>> Also, perhaps you could try bisecting the issue? I'm going on >>> holiday next week, but I'm sure other people could help. >>> >>> Paolo >>> > >