From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60419)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <s.priebe@profihost.ag>) id 1SzTgO-0001cu-BS
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 10:25:53 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <s.priebe@profihost.ag>) id 1SzTgI-0002W5-20
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 10:25:52 -0400
Received: from mail.profihost.ag ([85.158.179.208]:58549)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <s.priebe@profihost.ag>) id 1SzTgH-0002Vh-NC
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 10:25:45 -0400
Message-ID: <5023C867.9040306@profihost.ag>
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:25:43 +0200
From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <502283FA.2080506@profihost.ag> <5022912B.2000607@redhat.com>
	<50235527.4090804@profihost.ag> <50236059.7060801@redhat.com>
	<4A799203-5BFF-4DE9-9B85-459096EBEC22@profihost.ag>
	<50236484.2090702@redhat.com> <502369C7.7000300@profihost.ag>
	<CAJSP0QWXNcaGg=R5wOvzd_UVW2xNkGWS_7m8oQKpYpk4OcpLMg@mail.gmail.com>
	<50238E2A.1050203@profihost.ag>
	<CAJSP0QVFMav_uU+dmULFewoOUQiBpDqQ=Rb5y4g_1R5gu9saYQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<5023A83D.9070509@profihost.ag> <5023AAB8.1090703@redhat.com>
	<5023AD9F.1070207@profihost.ag>
	<CAN05THS22ybq77EyDKsPWE8zW_1u4F5XzKV3N3-DKF7DM-pu9w@mail.gmail.com>
	<5023B7FD.6060306@redhat.com> <5023BDA6.7090907@profihost.ag>
	<5023BE37.30106@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <5023BE37.30106@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-scsi vs. virtio-blk
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, ronnie sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>


Am 09.08.2012 15:42, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> Il 09/08/2012 15:39, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG ha scritto:
>>> scsi-generic would indeed incur some overhead because it does not do
>>> scatter/gather I/O directly, but scsi-hd/scsi-block do not have this
>>> overhead.  In any case, that should be visible through the output of
>>> perf if it is significant.
>>
>> Thanks for your help and replies. I'm a little bit lost on all these
>> comments. So what to check / do next?
>
> Try with the deadline scheduler, and run "perf top" in guest/host if the
> problems persist.

Right now i'm just starting to ping from the guest to a random domain. 
it works for around 65s then i get the message:
ping: senmsg: No buffer space available

and the network connection is away until i reboot the guest.

Stefan