From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 09:46:22 +0200 Subject: [GIT PULL] at91: platform data for atmel-mci (for 3.5) In-Reply-To: <201207252006.44523.arnd@arndb.de> References: <4FBE4FE7.3010005@atmel.com> <4FC722B7.10409@atmel.com> <201207252006.44523.arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: <5024BC4E.9010709@atmel.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 07/25/2012 10:06 PM, Arnd Bergmann : > On Thursday 31 May 2012, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >> >> On 05/24/2012 05:12 PM, Nicolas Ferre : >>> Hi Arnd, hi Olof, >> >> Ping? >> >> (or maybe you will have a look at this after the merge window...) >> > > I've just gone through all old pull requests that I had somewhere in > my inbox and this turned out to be one that we never pulled. > > It looks like it still applies and we should send it to Linus as as > late branch this time, given that we screwed up and it was there > all the time. > > Nicolas, can you please confirm? Arnd, I have sent to you a pull-request covering this work several days ago ([GIT PULL] at91: soc update (for 3.6)): what is your feeling about it: do you think that it will still go upstream for 3.6? Thanks, bye, -- Nicolas Ferre From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757248Ab2HJHqb (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Aug 2012 03:46:31 -0400 Received: from eusmtp01.atmel.com ([212.144.249.242]:51500 "EHLO eusmtp01.atmel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755796Ab2HJHq1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Aug 2012 03:46:27 -0400 Message-ID: <5024BC4E.9010709@atmel.com> Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 09:46:22 +0200 From: Nicolas Ferre Organization: atmel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson CC: linux-arm-kernel , Ludovic Desroches , Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD , Linux Kernel list Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] at91: platform data for atmel-mci (for 3.5) References: <4FBE4FE7.3010005@atmel.com> <4FC722B7.10409@atmel.com> <201207252006.44523.arnd@arndb.de> In-Reply-To: <201207252006.44523.arnd@arndb.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5a1pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.159.128.40] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/25/2012 10:06 PM, Arnd Bergmann : > On Thursday 31 May 2012, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >> >> On 05/24/2012 05:12 PM, Nicolas Ferre : >>> Hi Arnd, hi Olof, >> >> Ping? >> >> (or maybe you will have a look at this after the merge window...) >> > > I've just gone through all old pull requests that I had somewhere in > my inbox and this turned out to be one that we never pulled. > > It looks like it still applies and we should send it to Linus as as > late branch this time, given that we screwed up and it was there > all the time. > > Nicolas, can you please confirm? Arnd, I have sent to you a pull-request covering this work several days ago ([GIT PULL] at91: soc update (for 3.6)): what is your feeling about it: do you think that it will still go upstream for 3.6? Thanks, bye, -- Nicolas Ferre