From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Wagner Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] cgroup cls & netprio 'cleanups' Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 15:25:50 +0200 Message-ID: <502A51DE.7040809@monom.org> References: <1344949343-26090-1-git-send-email-wagi@monom.org> <20120814131035.GC18731@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120814131035.GC18731-B26myB8xz7F8NnZeBjwnZQMhkBWG/bsMQH7oEaQurus@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Neil Horman Cc: netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Daniel Wagner , "David S. Miller" , Al Viro , Andrew Morton , Eric Dumazet , Gao feng , Glauber Costa , Jamal Hadi Salim , John Fastabend , Kamezawa Hiroyuki , Li Zefan , Tejun Heo , Tim Chen Hi Neil, On 14.08.2012 15:10, Neil Horman wrote: > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 03:02:16PM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote: >> From: Daniel Wagner >> >> Hi, >> >> Sorry for the delay on updating this series. The usual >> excuse apply here. >> >> I saw that John is busy improving net_prio so I took the >> liberty to port his changes to net_cls (#1-3). Patch #3 will >> collide with John's unapplied patches. I am happy >> to rebase this series if needed. >> >> Patch #4 and #5 improve the readability with using >> IS_MODULE/BUILTIN macros. This patches prepare the last >> patch. >> >> Patch #6 removes support for assigning subsystem IDs during >> runtime. As it turns out this is not really needed. By doing >> so we are able to free some unused memory. >> >> The patches are against net-next. >> >> cheers, >> daniel >> > These aren't so much 'cleanups' as feature enhancements and fixes for the first > pass of those enhancements (at least in the case of the net_prio cgroup). Sorry about that. I wanted to keep the series title, so that someone looking up older versions find it. > I've nothing against them, but since we're still going through some churn on the > net_prio variant, it may be best to wait until thats settled before moving them > over to net_cls. Sure, I can update this series when the net_prio controller changes have settled down. I just wonder if it wouldn't make sense to merge them together. Obviously, that will break the user space which is not a good thing but having a controller per socket option is not good either. cheers, daniel