All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Andreas Bießmann" <andreas.devel@googlemail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/3] at91: atmel_nand: add PMECC(Programmable Multibit ECC controller) support
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 10:47:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <502B6238.9000204@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <502B5B7F.4000606@atmel.com>

Dear Josh Wu,

On 15.08.2012 10:19, Josh Wu wrote:
> Hi, Andreas
> 
> Thank you for the quick reply.
> 
> On 8/15/2012 3:50 PM, Andreas Bie?mann wrote:
>> Dear Josh Wu,
>>
>> On 15.08.2012 08:50, Josh Wu wrote:
>>> Hi, Andreas

<snip>

>> And the last, you should add at least one user of this feature. Isn't
>> the lately applied at91sam9x5ek (is in u-boot-atmel/master and
>> u-boot-arm/master) a perfect user for that?
> 
> you are right, The PMECC usage is for 9x5ek board.
> I planed to push the PMECC support patches in 9x5 board in two part:
>    one is this series, which only include nand flash driver changes. I
> thought those patches should be merged by u-boot mtd maintainer.

I don't care whether Scott Wood or I take the patch (Scott, can you
please comment?). If Scott takes it I should ack or the other way round.

>    Another part is some patches for 9x5 board file and config file which
> enable PMECC in 9x5ek board. Those patches are not sent out yet.

For me it is a must to have at least one user of the added feature.

> Now I think if you can merge all above patches to u-boot mainline, then
> maybe I can sent those patches together. What do you think about this?

I think there should be one patch in the series enabling the usage of
the feature. Who takes this patch is another question but I favor to
enable the series in a single step.

>>> On 8/9/2012 6:21 PM, Josh Wu wrote:
>>>> This patch series will add PMECC support for atmel nand driver in
>>>> u-boot.
>>>>
>>>> The driver patch is ported from kernel patch. The main different from
>>>> kernel patch is
>>>> the modification about registers access part. in this version it via a
>>>> register structure to access.
>> A question regarding linux driver. You say it is derived from the kernel
>> driver, but I can not see PMECC stuff in kernel:
> 
> Sorry,  I am not make it clear about this. Actually, The PMECC stuff is
> not in v3.6-rc1 now, it is queued in kernel MTD maintainer's git tree:
> http://git.infradead.org/linux-mtd.git/commit/1c7b874d33b463f7150b1ab4617f000af9b327fd

Ah, I see, just found your mail on the mtd list a couple of minutes ago.
I asked just to have something to compare with, I do not want to dive
into the specs just to get a clue whats going on.

> Seems the maintainer missed the merge window of v3.6-rc1. I am not sure
> that can go into v3.6 or not. But I think it is not a bad idea to push
> those code into u-boot. :)

Me too.

<snip>

>>>> It is tested in atmel 9x5 series board.
>> Unfortunately I can not test this driver cause I do only have older
>> sam926x devices around.
> 
> If I send 9x5 board enable patches with nand PMECC patches together, I
> think maybe other people can test it in 9x5ed board.

Would be great to get some tested by for the patches.

Best regards

Andreas Bie?mann

      reply	other threads:[~2012-08-15  8:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-09 10:21 [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/3] at91: atmel_nand: add PMECC(Programmable Multibit ECC controller) support Josh Wu
2012-08-09 10:21 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] at91: atmel_nand: extract HWECC initialization code into one function: atmel_hw_nand_init_param() Josh Wu
2012-08-09 10:21 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] at91: atmel_nand: remove unused variables Josh Wu
2012-08-09 10:21 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] at91: atmel_nand: Update driver to support Programmable Multibit ECC controller Josh Wu
2012-08-15  6:50 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/3] at91: atmel_nand: add PMECC(Programmable Multibit ECC controller) support Josh Wu
2012-08-15  7:50   ` Andreas Bießmann
2012-08-15  8:19     ` Josh Wu
2012-08-15  8:47       ` Andreas Bießmann [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=502B6238.9000204@gmail.com \
    --to=andreas.devel@googlemail.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.