From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 19:23:32 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/8] *** ARM: Update arch-vt8500 to Devicetree *** Message-Id: <502BF734.9000608@wwwdotorg.org> List-Id: References: <1344477300-25251-1-git-send-email-linux@prisktech.co.nz> In-Reply-To: <1344477300-25251-1-git-send-email-linux@prisktech.co.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On 08/08/2012 07:54 PM, Tony Prisk wrote: > This patchset updates arch-vt8500 to devicetree and removes all the old-style > code. Support for WM8650 has also been added. Sorry for taking such a long time to re-review this. I scanned the series looking for just the changes to the issues I raised on v1, and I do see almost everything has been fixed up OK, except for the one issue I just commented on. So, aside from that, this series is fine by me. I'll defer to others about whether it's necessary to fix the display node-name-vs.-phandle issue I pointed out, or defer that until later. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/8] *** ARM: Update arch-vt8500 to Devicetree *** Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 13:23:32 -0600 Message-ID: <502BF734.9000608@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1344477300-25251-1-git-send-email-linux@prisktech.co.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1344477300-25251-1-git-send-email-linux-ci5G2KO2hbZ+pU9mqzGVBQ@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: "devicetree-discuss" To: Tony Prisk Cc: linux-fbdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Mark Brown , vt8500-wm8505-linux-kernel-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org, Russell King , rtc-linux-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org, Florian Tobias Schandinat , Alan Stern , Eric Andersson , linux-serial-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Hauke Mehrtens , devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, Rob Herring , Stephen Warren , Neil Zhang , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Alan Cox , Alessandro Zummo , Linus Walleij , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Felipe Balbi List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org On 08/08/2012 07:54 PM, Tony Prisk wrote: > This patchset updates arch-vt8500 to devicetree and removes all the old-style > code. Support for WM8650 has also been added. Sorry for taking such a long time to re-review this. I scanned the series looking for just the changes to the issues I raised on v1, and I do see almost everything has been fixed up OK, except for the one issue I just commented on. So, aside from that, this series is fine by me. I'll defer to others about whether it's necessary to fix the display node-name-vs.-phandle issue I pointed out, or defer that until later. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 13:23:32 -0600 Subject: [PATCHv2 0/8] *** ARM: Update arch-vt8500 to Devicetree *** In-Reply-To: <1344477300-25251-1-git-send-email-linux@prisktech.co.nz> References: <1344477300-25251-1-git-send-email-linux@prisktech.co.nz> Message-ID: <502BF734.9000608@wwwdotorg.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 08/08/2012 07:54 PM, Tony Prisk wrote: > This patchset updates arch-vt8500 to devicetree and removes all the old-style > code. Support for WM8650 has also been added. Sorry for taking such a long time to re-review this. I scanned the series looking for just the changes to the issues I raised on v1, and I do see almost everything has been fixed up OK, except for the one issue I just commented on. So, aside from that, this series is fine by me. I'll defer to others about whether it's necessary to fix the display node-name-vs.-phandle issue I pointed out, or defer that until later. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755717Ab2HOTXm (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Aug 2012 15:23:42 -0400 Received: from avon.wwwdotorg.org ([70.85.31.133]:50148 "EHLO avon.wwwdotorg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755509Ab2HOTXi (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Aug 2012 15:23:38 -0400 Message-ID: <502BF734.9000608@wwwdotorg.org> Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 13:23:32 -0600 From: Stephen Warren User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tony Prisk CC: vt8500-wm8505-linux-kernel@googlegroups.com, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown , Grant Likely , Russell King , rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, Florian Tobias Schandinat , Alan Stern , Eric Andersson , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Hauke Mehrtens , devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, Rob Herring , Stephen Warren , Neil Zhang , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Alan Cox , Alessandro Zummo , Linus Walleij , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Felipe Balbi , Rob Landley Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/8] *** ARM: Update arch-vt8500 to Devicetree *** References: <1344477300-25251-1-git-send-email-linux@prisktech.co.nz> In-Reply-To: <1344477300-25251-1-git-send-email-linux@prisktech.co.nz> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5a1pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08/08/2012 07:54 PM, Tony Prisk wrote: > This patchset updates arch-vt8500 to devicetree and removes all the old-style > code. Support for WM8650 has also been added. Sorry for taking such a long time to re-review this. I scanned the series looking for just the changes to the issues I raised on v1, and I do see almost everything has been fixed up OK, except for the one issue I just commented on. So, aside from that, this series is fine by me. I'll defer to others about whether it's necessary to fix the display node-name-vs.-phandle issue I pointed out, or defer that until later.