From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53899)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mjt@tls.msk.ru>) id 1T1vOf-00019X-Fk
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 04:25:42 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mjt@tls.msk.ru>) id 1T1vOe-0007ob-0w
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 04:25:41 -0400
Received: from isrv.corpit.ru ([86.62.121.231]:54594)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mjt@tls.msk.ru>) id 1T1vOd-0007lO-Py
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 04:25:39 -0400
Message-ID: <502CAE80.2040908@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:25:36 +0400
From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <502CA537.2010402@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <502CABD1.7050105@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <502CABD1.7050105@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Apparent USB assignment issue on 1.1+
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On 16.08.2012 12:14, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On 08/16/12 09:45, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> This issue has been reported several times already,
>> but I can't reproduce it locally.  Gerd, can you
>> please take a look, maybe you may ask better
>> question to the OP(s) about what to try.
>>
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1033727
> 
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/176030/ could fix this.

Interesting.

> If not: enable all usb_host_* tracepoints & send log.

Ok, will try to ping the OP... ;)

>> http://bugs.debian.org/683983
> 
> No idea, must be some QOM thingy.

There are two issues in there -- QOM (assertion failure)
is unrelated.  The main issue is that win BSODs when
trying to use the USB device, but it worked fine in 1.0.

I guess the only possible solution here is to try to
bisect it.  But it wont be easy due to other issues
between 1.0 and 1.1.


Overall, somehow I thought the two issues are related.
Now when I re-read it again, I don't see why I thought
so -- that's two different problems apparently.

Thank you!

/mjt