From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [143.182.124.37]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2CF5E01449 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 13:29:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from azsmga002.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.35]) by azsmga102.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Aug 2012 13:29:48 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,774,1336374000"; d="scan'208,217";a="134709155" Received: from orsmsx603.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.226.49]) by AZSMGA002.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Aug 2012 13:29:24 -0700 Received: from orsmsx103.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.225.130) by orsmsx603.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.226.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.255.0; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 13:29:22 -0700 Received: from orsmsx101.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.8.152]) by ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.138]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 13:29:21 -0700 From: "Rifenbark, Scott M" To: Yocto discussion list Thread-Topic: Terminology Question for Kernels Thread-Index: Ac17JKa6NWhfGICiTM2yiIhmbRJXlw== Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 20:29:21 +0000 Message-ID: <41DEA4B02DBDEF40A0F3B6D0DDB1237946A5DAAD@ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.22.254.140] MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Terminology Question for Kernels X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 20:29:48 -0000 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_41DEA4B02DBDEF40A0F3B6D0DDB1237946A5DAADORSMSX101amrcor_" --_000_41DEA4B02DBDEF40A0F3B6D0DDB1237946A5DAADORSMSX101amrcor_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Need some opinions here.... What is the best way to generically refer to on= e of our kernels in the source repository area. Right now, they are all gro= uped under the heading "Yocto Linux Kernel." They are individually named li= nux-yocto-xxxx. In the kernel manual, we refer to them collectively as a "Y= octo Project Kernel." I would like to have a single way to reference these = kernels we deliver. Thanks, Scott Scott Rifenbark Intel Corporation Yocto Project Documentation 503.712.2702 503.341.0418 (cell) --_000_41DEA4B02DBDEF40A0F3B6D0DDB1237946A5DAADORSMSX101amrcor_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

Need some opinions here.... What is = the best way to generically refer to one of our kernels in the source repos= itory area. Right now, they are all grouped under the heading "Yocto Linux Kernel." They are individually named linux-yocto-xx= xx. In the kernel manual, we refer to them collectively as a "Yocto Pr= oject Kernel." I would like to have a single way to reference these ke= rnels we deliver.

Thanks,

Scott

Scott Rifenbark<= b>

Intel Corporation

Yocto Project Documentation

503.712.2702

503.341.0418 (cell)

--_000_41DEA4B02DBDEF40A0F3B6D0DDB1237946A5DAADORSMSX101amrcor_-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90619E011AD for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 07:55:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q7GEt3wl026551 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 16 Aug 2012 07:55:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.146.67] (128.224.146.67) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.309.2; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 07:55:03 -0700 Message-ID: <502D09C2.6050007@windriver.com> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:54:58 -0400 From: Bruce Ashfield User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Rifenbark, Scott M" References: <41DEA4B02DBDEF40A0F3B6D0DDB1237946A5DAAD@ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <41DEA4B02DBDEF40A0F3B6D0DDB1237946A5DAAD@ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com> Cc: Yocto discussion list Subject: Re: Terminology Question for Kernels X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 14:55:04 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12-08-15 04:29 PM, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote: > Hi, > > Need some opinions here.... What is the best way to generically refer to > one of our kernels in the source repository area. Right now, they are > all grouped under the heading "Yocto Linux Kernel." They are > individually named linux-yocto-xxxx. In the kernel manual, we refer to > them collectively as a "Yocto Project Kernel." I would like to have a > single way to reference these kernels we deliver. I don't have a strong opinion. So either Yocto Linux Kernel or Yocto Project Kernel seem fine to me, we could be more precise, but I'd rather keep it simple. Cheers, Bruce > > Thanks, > > Scott > > *Scott Rifenbark*** > > Intel Corporation > > Yocto Project Documentation > > 503.712.2702 > > 503.341.0418 (cell) > > > > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto