From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com>
To: vincent Ferrer <vincentchicago1@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: raid5 to utilize upto 8 cores
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 03:29:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <502E00F1.8090207@hardwarefreak.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEyJA_sfAUk9PNFfss9m=pAi90Pb0gTHo9seV-BDexr3pLVvxg@mail.gmail.com>
On 8/16/2012 5:11 PM, vincent Ferrer wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com> wrote:
>> On 8/15/2012 9:56 PM, vincent Ferrer wrote:
>>
>>> - My storage server has upto 8 cores running linux kernel 2.6.32.27.
>>> - I created a raid5 device of 10 SSDs .
>>
>> No it is not normal practice. I 'preach' against it regularly when I
>> see OPs doing it. It's quite insane.
>>
>> There are a couple of sane things you can do today to address your problem:
>>
>> Stan
>>
>
> Hi Stan,
> Follow-up question for 2 types of setups i may have to prepare:
> 1) setup A has 80 SSDs.
This is simply silly. There's no need for exaggeration here.
> 2) Setup B has only 12 SSDs. Question: Is it more practical to
> have only one raid5 device, even though I may have 4-5 physically
> different clients or create 2 raid5 devices each having 6 SSDs.
As I repeat in every such case: What is your workload? Creating a
storage specification is driven by the requirements of the workload.
--
Stan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-17 8:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-16 2:56 raid5 to utilize upto 8 cores vincent Ferrer
2012-08-16 5:58 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-08-16 7:03 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2012-08-16 7:52 ` David Brown
2012-08-16 15:47 ` Flynn
2012-08-17 7:15 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-08-17 7:29 ` David Brown
2012-08-17 10:52 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-08-17 11:47 ` David Brown
2012-08-18 4:55 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-08-18 8:59 ` David Brown
[not found] ` <CAEyJA_ungvS_o6dpKL+eghpavRwtY9eaDNCRJF0eUULoC0P6BA@mail.gmail.com>
2012-08-16 8:55 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-08-16 22:11 ` vincent Ferrer
2012-08-17 7:52 ` David Brown
2012-08-17 8:29 ` Stan Hoeppner [this message]
[not found] ` <CAD9gYJLwuai2kGw1D1wQoK8cOvMOiCCcN3hAY=k_jj0=4og3Vg@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAEyJA_tGFtN2HMYa=vDV7m9N8thA-6MJ5TFo20X1yEpG3HQWYw@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAD9gYJK09kRMb_v25uwmG7eRfFQLQyEd4SMXWBSPwYkpP56jcw@mail.gmail.com>
2012-08-16 21:51 ` vincent Ferrer
2012-08-16 22:29 ` Roberto Spadim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=502E00F1.8090207@hardwarefreak.com \
--to=stan@hardwarefreak.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vincentchicago1@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.