From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:16:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from nbd.name ([46.4.11.11]:34913 "EHLO nbd.name" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S1903438Ab2HQNQD (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:16:03 +0200 Message-ID: <502E43CC.2030509@phrozen.org> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:14:52 +0200 From: John Crispin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111114 Icedove/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Whitespace and various formatting clean-ups for microMIPS. References: <1343166045-1974-1-git-send-email-sjhill@mips.com> In-Reply-To: <1343166045-1974-1-git-send-email-sjhill@mips.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-archive-position: 34253 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: john@phrozen.org Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips Return-Path: On 24/07/12 23:40, Steven J. Hill wrote: > diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/proc.c b/arch/mips/kernel/proc.c > index 5542817..5569d09 100644 > --- a/arch/mips/kernel/proc.c > +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/proc.c > @@ -64,13 +64,14 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m, void *v) > cpu_data[n].watch_reg_masks[i]); > seq_printf(m, "]\n"); > } > - seq_printf(m, "ASEs implemented\t:%s%s%s%s%s%s\n", > + seq_printf(m, "ASEs implemented\t:%s%s%s%s%s%s%s\n", > cpu_has_mips16 ? " mips16" : "", > cpu_has_mdmx ? " mdmx" : "", > cpu_has_mips3d ? " mips3d" : "", > cpu_has_smartmips ? " smartmips" : "", > cpu_has_dsp ? " dsp" : "", > - cpu_has_mipsmt ? " mt" : "" > + cpu_has_mipsmt ? " mt" : "", > + cpu_has_mmips ? " micromips" : "" > ); > seq_printf(m, "shadow register sets\t: %d\n", > cpu_data[n].srsets); Hi, this looks like it should not be part of the patch ? John