From: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>
To: Marina Makienko <makienko@ispras.ru>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
"Roy.Li" <rongqing.li@windriver.com>,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ldv-project@ispras.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: octeon: Add prevent NAPI from scheduling
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 09:26:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5032653A.9090403@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1345459282-8666-1-git-send-email-makienko@ispras.ru>
On 08/20/2012 03:41 AM, Marina Makienko wrote:
> Code inspection shows that this can
> only be triggered by calling napi_enable() without
> napi_disable().
>
> Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org).
>
> Signed-off-by: Marina Makienko <makienko@ispras.ru>
> ---
> drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-rx.c | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-rx.c b/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-rx.c
> index 34afc16..db81613 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-rx.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-rx.c
> @@ -560,4 +560,5 @@ void cvm_oct_rx_shutdown(void)
> /* Shutdown all of the NAPIs */
> for_each_possible_cpu(i)
> netif_napi_del(&cvm_oct_napi[i].napi);
> + napi_disable(&cvm_oct_napi[i].napi);
Does the order of netif_napi_del() and napi_disable() matter? If so,
does this patch have the correct ordering?
I don't really want to apply the patch until we know the answer to these
two questions.
David Daney
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-20 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-20 10:41 [PATCH] staging: octeon: Add prevent NAPI from scheduling Marina Makienko
2012-08-20 16:26 ` David Daney [this message]
2012-08-21 7:48 ` [PATCH] staging: octeon: Add prevent NAPI from scheduling IN-REPLY-TO: Marina Makienko
2012-08-21 11:18 ` Marina Makienko
2012-08-20 17:00 ` [PATCH] staging: octeon: Add prevent NAPI from scheduling Max Filippov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5032653A.9090403@gmail.com \
--to=ddaney.cavm@gmail.com \
--cc=david.daney@cavium.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ldv-project@ispras.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=makienko@ispras.ru \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=rongqing.li@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.