From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roland Stigge Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] i2c: pnx: Fix bit definitions Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 22:47:29 +0200 Message-ID: <5032A261.8060702@antcom.de> References: <1344411752-23469-1-git-send-email-stigge@antcom.de> <20120818095108.GB24812@pengutronix.de> <5030A81E.5090508@antcom.de> <083DF309106F364B939360100EC290F823A0354A3D@eu1rdcrdc1wx030.exi.nxp.com> <20120820175527.GA9169@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120820175527.GA9169@pengutronix.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Kevin Wells , "vitalywool@gmail.com" , "khali@linux-fr.org" , "ben-linux@fluff.org" , "grant.likely@secretlab.ca" , "linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Srinivas Bakki , "aletes.xgr@gmail.com" , "jonsmirl@gmail.com" List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On 20/08/12 19:55, Wolfram Sang wrote: >> I've never had my hands on a PNX4008 chip at NXP, but I do >> believe they are the same IP. That specific I2C IP was used in a >> number of NXP/Phillips chips besides the PNX4008/LPC32xx. I don't >> think there are any PNX4008's in the wild, and even working in >> NXP, I can't find any non-marketing reference material for that >> part (including the user manual). > > Thanks for the heads up. I'll apply both patches, then. > > Roland, this looks like 3.6-material? Yes, all bugfixes. Thanks, Roland