Re: [meta-fsl-ppc][PATCH 2/2] fsl.conf: Let linux-qoriq-sdk-headers-nativesdk provide linux-libc-headers-nativesdk

["David Nyström" <david.nystrom@enea.com>]

On 08/20/2012 09:50 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
> Adding David back...
>
> -M
>
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Matthew McClintock <msm@freescale.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I just checked and we do have a few obscure bits in our kernel tree's
>>>> header files. Nothing that 99.9% would use but it seems reasonable to
>>>> include these...
>>> Do you want applications for sdk host to be built using these obscure bits ?
>>> if yes I would like to know why?
>>>
>>> since then you are creating a scenariou where nativesdk is dependent on target
>>> kernel and we need to fix it so that nativesdk can be common again.
>>>
>>> if patches you are carrying are good for nativesdk headers can they be made
>>> available for other kernels like linux-yocto e.g. ?
>>>
>>> right now if we do this we are pretty much saying fsl machine layer can really
>>> not mix with other BSPs. Many people use yocto commonly on more than one kind
>>> of CPU and this does not scale.
>> Hmm I think I was just confused. We don't need any modifications for
>> the headers for nativesdk foo (that is the x86 tools in
>> meta-toolchain).
>>
>> So, I think everything is OK as is.. if you look at meta-toolchain you
>> will see it includes our kernel's headers for cross compiling.
>>
>> -M

Oh, sorry for the misunderstanding

I was under the impression that linux-libc-headers-nativesdk was 
installed under
/opt/poky/1.2/sysroots/<target-sysroot>/..., which it obviously is not.

Br,
David