From: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: "dhowells@redhat.com" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"rick.jones2@hp.com" <rick.jones2@hp.com>,
"ycheng@google.com" <ycheng@google.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<mikulas@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tun: don't zeroize sock->file on detach
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 20:04:41 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5033B199.6080305@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120809.161639.1789560369123168415.davem@davemloft.net>
10.08.2012 03:16, David Miller пишет:
> From: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
> Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:50:40 +0400
>
>> This is a fix for bug, introduced in 3.4 kernel by commit
>> 1ab5ecb90cb6a3df1476e052f76a6e8f6511cb3d, which, among other things, replaced
>> simple sock_put() by sk_release_kernel(). Below is sequence, which leads to
>> oops for non-persistent devices:
>>
>> tun_chr_close()
>> tun_detach() <== tun->socket.file = NULL
>> tun_free_netdev()
>> sk_release_sock()
>> sock_release(sock->file == NULL)
>> iput(SOCK_INODE(sock)) <== dereference on NULL pointer
>>
>> This patch just removes zeroing of socket's file from __tun_detach().
>> sock_release() will do this.
>>
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Reported-by: Ruan Zhijie <ruanzhijie@hotmail.com>
>> Tested-by: Ruan Zhijie <ruanzhijie@hotmail.com>
>> Acked-by: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
>> Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
>> Acked-by: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
>
> Applied, thanks.
>
Hi, David.
I found out, that this commit: b09e786bd1dd66418b69348cb110f3a64764626a
was previous attempt to fix the problem.
I believe this commit have to be dropped.
--
Best regards,
Stanislav Kinsbursky
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-21 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-09 12:50 [PATCH] tun: don't zeroize sock->file on detach Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-08-09 23:16 ` David Miller
2012-08-21 16:04 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky [this message]
2012-08-21 17:18 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-08-22 9:14 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5033B199.6080305@parallels.com \
--to=skinsbursky@parallels.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikulas@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
--cc=ycheng@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.