From: John Eaglesham <linux@8192.net>
To: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Jeremy Brookman <jeremy.brookman@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] bonding support for IPv6 transmit hashing
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:21:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <503409DC.5010001@8192.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11100.1345576795@death.nxdomain>
On 8/21/2012 12:19 PM, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> Jeremy Brookman <jeremy.brookman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> You should use a mix of tabs, as necessary, to get things to line up
>>> how I told you they need to line up.
>>
>> Unless I'm missing something, this change doesn't seem to have made it
>> through to the kernel tip, but we could really use this bugfix. Is it
>> in a repository I didn't notice, or not yet through the review? If
>> it's not through the review, is any help needed to get it there?
>
> The submitter (John Eaglesham) never posted an updated version
> that addressed the various comments, nor did his original patch
> submission include a Signed-off-by.
>
> I went ahead and updated the patch to address the comments; I've
> only compile tested this. Are you (Jeremy or John) able to test this to
> confirm that it will hash ipv6 traffic as expected (I can test it, but
> it won't be today)?
>
> John, can you post a Signed-off-by for your patch (really, this
> updated version of your patch)?
>
> If John signs off and somebody tests this, I'll post a formal
> submssion with the full commit message.
>
> -J
>
Since my last submission I ended up making some changes on my end to
streamline the logic. I can fold together my patch with yours and test
them later tonight. If everything looks good I'll post the changes back
to the list.
Thanks!
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-21 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-01 7:01 [PATCH v4 0/2] bonding support for IPv6 transmit hashing John Eaglesham
2012-07-01 7:01 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] Add support for IPv6 and bounds checking to transmit hashing functions John Eaglesham
2012-07-01 7:33 ` David Miller
2012-07-01 7:01 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] Update bonding driver documentation to include IPv6 transmit hashing algorithm John Eaglesham
2012-07-01 7:34 ` David Miller
2012-07-01 7:42 ` John Eaglesham
2012-07-01 8:07 ` [PATCH v5] bonding support for IPv6 transmit hashing John Eaglesham
2012-07-01 10:33 ` David Miller
2012-07-01 19:01 ` John Eaglesham
2012-07-01 19:13 ` [PATCH v6] " John Eaglesham
2012-07-02 23:33 ` Jay Vosburgh
2012-07-03 5:01 ` John Eaglesham
2012-07-03 5:14 ` David Miller
2012-07-03 5:38 ` John Eaglesham
2012-07-03 5:43 ` David Miller
2012-08-21 18:11 ` Jeremy Brookman
2012-08-21 19:19 ` Jay Vosburgh
2012-08-21 22:21 ` John Eaglesham [this message]
2012-08-22 12:06 ` Jeremy Brookman
2012-08-23 10:42 ` Jeremy Brookman
2012-08-22 5:12 ` [PATCH v7] bonding: " John Eaglesham
2012-08-22 5:29 ` David Miller
2012-08-22 6:43 ` [PATCH v8] " John Eaglesham
2012-08-23 5:49 ` David Miller
2012-08-23 12:23 ` Jeremy Brookman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=503409DC.5010001@8192.net \
--to=linux@8192.net \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jeremy.brookman@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.